linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] ACPI/NUMA: Print CXL Early Discovery Table (CEDT)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 22:55:35 +0100
From: Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ACPI/NUMA: Print CXL Early Discovery Table (CEDT)

On 18.03.24 14:30:11, Dan Williams wrote:
> Robert Richter wrote:
> > The CEDT contains similar entries as the SRAT. For diagnostic reasons
> > print the CEDT same style as the SRAT.
> 
> I will defer to Rafael here, but with acpica-tools, cxl-cli, and
> /proc/iomem is there much value to adding this to the boot-up logs by
> default?

Compared to the number of SRAT printks there are just a few CEDT
entries. I have added it as CEDT and SRAT entries have the similar
effect to NUMA, so diagnostics should be at the same level.

Thanks,

-Robert