[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240318-strncpy-drivers-thermal-intel-int340x_thermal-acpi_thermal_rel-c-v1-1-08839fbf737a@google.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 22:36:10 +0000
From: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] thermal: intel: int340x_thermal: replace deprecated strncpy
with strscpy
strncpy() is deprecated for use on NUL-terminated destination strings
[1] and as such we should prefer more robust and less ambiguous string
interfaces.
psvt->limit.string can only be 8 bytes so let's use the appropriate size
macro ACPI_LIMIT_STR_MAX_LEN.
Neither psvt->limit.string or psvt_user[i].limit.string requires the
NUL-padding behavior that strncpy() provides as they have both been
filled with NUL-bytes prior to the string operation.
| memset(&psvt->limit, 0, sizeof(u64));
and
| psvt_user = kzalloc(psvt_len, GFP_KERNEL);
Let's use `strscpy` [2] due to the fact that it guarantees
NUL-termination on the destination buffer without unnecessarily
NUL-padding.
Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strncpy-on-nul-terminated-strings [1]
Link: https://manpages.debian.org/testing/linux-manual-4.8/strscpy.9.en.html [2]
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/90
Cc: linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
---
Note: build-tested only.
Found with: $ rg "strncpy\("
---
drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/acpi_thermal_rel.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/acpi_thermal_rel.c b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/acpi_thermal_rel.c
index dc519a665c18..4b4a4d63e61f 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/acpi_thermal_rel.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/acpi_thermal_rel.c
@@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ static int acpi_parse_psvt(acpi_handle handle, int *psvt_count, struct psvt **ps
if (knob->type == ACPI_TYPE_STRING) {
memset(&psvt->limit, 0, sizeof(u64));
- strncpy(psvt->limit.string, psvt_ptr->limit.str_ptr, knob->string.length);
+ strscpy(psvt->limit.string, psvt_ptr->limit.str_ptr, ACPI_LIMIT_STR_MAX_LEN);
} else {
psvt->limit.integer = psvt_ptr->limit.integer;
}
@@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ static int fill_psvt(char __user *ubuf)
psvt_user[i].unlimit_coeff = psvts[i].unlimit_coeff;
psvt_user[i].control_knob_type = psvts[i].control_knob_type;
if (psvt_user[i].control_knob_type == ACPI_TYPE_STRING)
- strncpy(psvt_user[i].limit.string, psvts[i].limit.string,
+ strscpy(psvt_user[i].limit.string, psvts[i].limit.string,
ACPI_LIMIT_STR_MAX_LEN);
else
psvt_user[i].limit.integer = psvts[i].limit.integer;
---
base-commit: bf3a69c6861ff4dc7892d895c87074af7bc1c400
change-id: 20240318-strncpy-drivers-thermal-intel-int340x_thermal-acpi_thermal_rel-c-17070c1e42f3
Best regards,
--
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists