[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240318055054.1564696-1-d-gole@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 11:20:51 +0530
From: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki"
<rafael@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
CC: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Pavel
Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>,
Dhruva
Gole <d-gole@...com>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] PM: wakeup: make device_wakeup_disable return void
This is a follow up patch based on discussions with Rafael[0] on a previous
patch I sent to propagate return value from device_wakeup_disable
further upward inside device_init_wakeup
However, it doesn't seem like today any return values from
device_wakeup_disable are very useful to the caller.
I could only spot one caller of this function that was actually
propagating the return value upward other than the PM core calls. I have
tried to update sdhci-pci-core to work with the new changes
I think that the patch 3/3 should go via Adrian or Ulf's tree, rest are
all PM core changes.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAJZ5v0jbHwiZemtNAoM-jmgB_58VqmKUkqv4P7qrPkxWzBzMyQ@mail.gmail.com/
Dhruva Gole (3):
PM: wakeup: make device_wakeup_disable return void
PM: wakeup: Remove unnecessary else from device_init_wakeup
mmc: sdhci-pci: Use device_set_wakeup_enable for en/disable wakeups
drivers/base/power/wakeup.c | 11 +++++++----
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c | 4 ++--
include/linux/pm_wakeup.h | 12 +++++-------
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists