[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d5a1adac-d0d1-4eac-b5ad-b2b8f4d9d971@os.amperecomputing.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 12:47:24 +0530
From: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@...amperecomputing.com>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>, Zenghui Yu
<yuzenghui@...wei.com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@....com>, Fuad Tabba <tabba@...gle.com>,
linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 04/28] arm64: RME: Check for RME support at KVM init
On 27-01-2023 04:59 pm, Steven Price wrote:
> Query the RMI version number and check if it is a compatible version. A
> static key is also provided to signal that a supported RMM is available.
>
> Functions are provided to query if a VM or VCPU is a realm (or rec)
> which currently will always return false.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 17 ++++++++++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 +++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h | 22 +++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h | 1 +
> arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile | 3 +-
> arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 8 +++++
> arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 7 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> index 9bdba47f7e14..5a2b7229e83f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> @@ -490,4 +490,21 @@ static inline bool vcpu_has_feature(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int feature)
> return test_bit(feature, vcpu->arch.features);
> }
>
> +static inline bool kvm_is_realm(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> + if (static_branch_unlikely(&kvm_rme_is_available))
> + return kvm->arch.is_realm;
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +static inline enum realm_state kvm_realm_state(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> + return READ_ONCE(kvm->arch.realm.state);
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool vcpu_is_rec(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> #endif /* __ARM64_KVM_EMULATE_H__ */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 35a159d131b5..04347c3a8c6b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> #include <asm/fpsimd.h>
> #include <asm/kvm.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_asm.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_rme.h>
>
> #define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_INTC_INITIALIZED
>
> @@ -240,6 +241,9 @@ struct kvm_arch {
> * the associated pKVM instance in the hypervisor.
> */
> struct kvm_protected_vm pkvm;
> +
> + bool is_realm;
> + struct realm realm;
> };
>
> struct kvm_vcpu_fault_info {
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c26bc2c6770d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2023 ARM Ltd.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __ASM_KVM_RME_H
> +#define __ASM_KVM_RME_H
> +
> +enum realm_state {
> + REALM_STATE_NONE,
> + REALM_STATE_NEW,
> + REALM_STATE_ACTIVE,
> + REALM_STATE_DYING
> +};
> +
> +struct realm {
> + enum realm_state state;
> +};
> +
> +int kvm_init_rme(void);
> +
> +#endif
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
> index 4eb601e7de50..be1383e26626 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
> @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ void __hyp_set_vectors(phys_addr_t phys_vector_base);
> void __hyp_reset_vectors(void);
>
> DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(kvm_protected_mode_initialized);
> +DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(kvm_rme_is_available);
>
> /* Reports the availability of HYP mode */
> static inline bool is_hyp_mode_available(void)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
> index 5e33c2d4645a..d2f0400c50da 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
> @@ -20,7 +20,8 @@ kvm-y += arm.o mmu.o mmio.o psci.o hypercalls.o pvtime.o \
> vgic/vgic-v3.o vgic/vgic-v4.o \
> vgic/vgic-mmio.o vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.o \
> vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.o vgic/vgic-kvm-device.o \
> - vgic/vgic-its.o vgic/vgic-debug.o
> + vgic/vgic-its.o vgic/vgic-debug.o \
> + rme.o
>
> kvm-$(CONFIG_HW_PERF_EVENTS) += pmu-emul.o pmu.o
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index 9c5573bc4614..d97b39d042ab 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
> #include <asm/kvm_asm.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_mmu.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_pkvm.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_rme.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
> #include <asm/sections.h>
>
> @@ -47,6 +48,7 @@
>
> static enum kvm_mode kvm_mode = KVM_MODE_DEFAULT;
> DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(kvm_protected_mode_initialized);
> +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(kvm_rme_is_available);
>
> DECLARE_KVM_HYP_PER_CPU(unsigned long, kvm_hyp_vector);
>
> @@ -2213,6 +2215,12 @@ int kvm_arch_init(void *opaque)
>
> in_hyp_mode = is_kernel_in_hyp_mode();
>
> + if (in_hyp_mode) {
> + err = kvm_init_rme();
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_DEVICE_LOAD_ACQUIRE) ||
> cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_1508412))
> kvm_info("Guests without required CPU erratum workarounds can deadlock system!\n" \
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..f6b587bc116e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2023 ARM Ltd.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/rmi_cmds.h>
> +#include <asm/virt.h>
> +
> +static int rmi_check_version(void)
> +{
> + struct arm_smccc_res res;
> + int version_major, version_minor;
> +
> + arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(SMC_RMI_VERSION, &res);
> +
> + if (res.a0 == SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED)
> + return -ENXIO;
> +
> + version_major = RMI_ABI_VERSION_GET_MAJOR(res.a0);
> + version_minor = RMI_ABI_VERSION_GET_MINOR(res.a0);
> +
> + if (version_major != RMI_ABI_MAJOR_VERSION) {
> + kvm_err("Unsupported RMI ABI (version %d.%d) we support %d\n",
Can we please replace "we support" to host supports.
Also in the patch present in the repo, you are using variable
our_version, can this be changed to host_version?
> + version_major, version_minor,
> + RMI_ABI_MAJOR_VERSION);
> + return -ENXIO;
> + }
> +
> + kvm_info("RMI ABI version %d.%d\n", version_major, version_minor);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_init_rme(void)
> +{
> + if (PAGE_SIZE != SZ_4K)
> + /* Only 4k page size on the host is supported */
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (rmi_check_version())
> + /* Continue without realm support */
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* Future patch will enable static branch kvm_rme_is_available */
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Thanks,
Ganapat
Powered by blists - more mailing lists