lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 11:02:47 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Chanh Nguyen <chanh@...eremail.onmicrosoft.com>,
 Chanh Nguyen <chanh@...amperecomputing.com>, Jean Delvare
 <jdelvare@...e.com>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
 Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Justin Ledford
 <justinledford@...gle.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 OpenBMC Maillist <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
 Open Source Submission <patches@...erecomputing.com>
Cc: Phong Vo <phong@...amperecomputing.com>,
 Thang Nguyen <thang@...amperecomputing.com>,
 Quan Nguyen <quan@...amperecomputing.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: hwmon: max31790: Add
 pwmout-pin-as-tach-input property

On 18/03/2024 10:48, Chanh Nguyen wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11/03/2024 23:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 11/03/2024 12:13, Chanh Nguyen wrote:
>>> Add pwmout-pin-as-tach-input property.
>>
>> Why is this split from original binding? This does not make much
>> sense... Add complete hardware description.
>>
> 
> Ok Krzysztof, I will merg the "[PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: hwmon: Add maxim 
> max31790 driver bindings" commit and "[PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: hwmon: 
> max31790: Add pwmout-pin-as-tach-input property" commit.

Later I checked your driver code and this explains a bit. However first
patch should explain that instead. The split is fine, but just lack of
rationale is confusing.


> 
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chanh Nguyen <chanh@...amperecomputing.com>
>>> ---
>>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/max31790.yaml | 11 +++++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/max31790.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/max31790.yaml
>>> index 5a93e6bdebda..447cac17053a 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/max31790.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/max31790.yaml
>>> @@ -25,6 +25,16 @@ properties:
>>>     reg:
>>>       maxItems: 1
>>>   
>>> +  pwmout-pin-as-tach-input:
>>> +    description: |
>>> +      An array of six integers responds to six PWM channels for
>>> +      configuring the pwm to tach mode.
>>> +      When set to 0, the associated PWMOUT produces a PWM waveform for
>>> +      control of fan speed. When set to 1, PWMOUT becomes a TACH input
>>
>> No vendor prefix, so generic property... but where is it defined?
>>
> 
> Thank Krzysztof! It is not generic property, I'll add the vendor prefix.
> 
> I'll update the "pwmout-pin-as-tach-input" to 
> "maxim,pwmout-pin-as-tach-input" at v2.

Except that you should really look into common properties and use them.
Or explain why do you need new property?

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ