linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/tsc: Use topology_max

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 09:57:30 +0800
From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, "H .
 Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	<x86@...nel.org>, <paulmck@...nel.org>, <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/tsc: Use topology_max_packages() to get package
 number

On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 10:03:38PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> 
> On 3/15/24 07:26, Feng Tang wrote:
> > Commit b50db7095fe0 ("x86/tsc: Disable clocksource watchdog for TSC
> > on qualified platorms") was introduced to solve problem that
> > sometimes TSC clocksource is wrongly judged as unstable by watchdog
> > like 'jiffies', HPET, etc.
> > 
> > In it, the hardware package number is a key factor for judging whether
> > to disable the watchdog for TSC, and 'nr_online_nodes' was chosen as
> > an estimation due to it is needed in early boot phase before
> > registering 'tsc-early' clocksource, where all none-boot CPUs are not
> 
> "none-boot"? You mean "non-boot". Right?

Yes, you are right. will fix it. non-boot CPU means AP (application
processor) here.

> 
> Other than that, the patch looks reasonable to me.

Thanks for the review!

- Feng

> Thanks,
> Longman
> 
>