[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <143bb232-1ba8-4e91-92a7-bab7c14f6df0@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 13:30:42 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Jan Dakinevich <jan.dakinevich@...utedevices.com>
Cc: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...utedevices.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/25] ASoC: meson: g12a-toacodec: add support for A1 SoC
family
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 06:19:36PM +0300, Jan Dakinevich wrote:
> On 3/15/24 16:33, Mark Brown wrote:
> > If the maximum register is 0 how does the regmap have a stride?
> reg_stride inherited from existing code. Apparently, it was meaningless
> even before my modifications (the hardware has single register
> regardless of max_register declaration) and it should be dropped. But,
> is it okay to remove it in the same commit?
Sure.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists