| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <8e8edccd-49d4-4157-b92d-8dd0630d52ac@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 09:04:22 -0500
From: Judith Mendez <jm@...com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
CC: Andrew Davis <afd@...com>, <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] mmc: sdhci_am654: Add tuning algorithm for delay
chain
Hi Adrian,
On 3/14/24 9:18 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 8/03/24 02:57, Judith Mendez wrote:
>> Currently the sdhci_am654 driver only supports one tuning
>> algorithm which should be used only when DLL is enabled. The
>> ITAPDLY is selected from the largest passing window and the
>> buffer is viewed as a circular buffer.
>>
>> The new algorithm should be used when the delay chain
>> is enabled. The ITAPDLY is selected from the largest passing
>> window and the buffer is not viewed as a circular buffer.
>>
>> This implementation is based off of the following paper: [1].
>>
>> Also add support for multiple failing windows.
>>
>> [1] https://www.ti.com/lit/an/spract9/spract9.pdf
>>
>> Fixes: 13ebeae68ac9 ("mmc: sdhci_am654: Add support for software tuning")
>> Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@...com>
>
> One question further below, and one cosmetic change, but resolve
> those and you may add to all patches in this patch set:
Appreciate your review, thanks.
>
> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
>
>> ---
>> Changelog:
>> v2->v3:
>> - Fix return for tuning algorithm
>> - Fix ITAPDLY_LAST_INDEX
>> - Use reverse fir tree order for variable declarations
>> - Remove unnecessary parenthesis
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
>> index d659c59422e1..d11b0d769e6c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
>> @@ -149,10 +149,17 @@ struct sdhci_am654_data {
>> int strb_sel;
>> u32 flags;
>> u32 quirks;
>> + bool dll_enable;
>>
>> #define SDHCI_AM654_QUIRK_FORCE_CDTEST BIT(0)
>> };
>>
>> +struct window {
>> + u8 start;
>> + u8 end;
>> + u8 length;
>> +};
>> +
>> struct sdhci_am654_driver_data {
>> const struct sdhci_pltfm_data *pdata;
>> u32 flags;
>> @@ -290,10 +297,12 @@ static void sdhci_am654_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock)
>>
>> regmap_update_bits(sdhci_am654->base, PHY_CTRL4, mask, val);
>>
>> - if (timing > MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR25 && clock >= CLOCK_TOO_SLOW_HZ)
>> + if (timing > MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR25 && clock >= CLOCK_TOO_SLOW_HZ) {
>> sdhci_am654_setup_dll(host, clock);
>> - else
>> + sdhci_am654->dll_enable = true;
>> + } else {
>> sdhci_am654_setup_delay_chain(sdhci_am654, timing);
>
> V2 patch had here:
>
> sdhci_am654->dll_enable = false;
>
> Was its removal intended?
I did remove on purpose since it did not seem to be necessary.
>
>> + }
>>
>> regmap_update_bits(sdhci_am654->base, PHY_CTRL5, CLKBUFSEL_MASK,
>> sdhci_am654->clkbuf_sel);
>> @@ -408,39 +417,102 @@ static u32 sdhci_am654_cqhci_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 intmask)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -#define ITAP_MAX 32
>> +#define ITAPDLY_LENGTH 32
>> +#define ITAPDLY_LAST_INDEX (ITAPDLY_LENGTH - 1)
>> +
>> +static u32 sdhci_am654_calculate_itap(struct sdhci_host *host, struct window
>> + *fail_window, u8 num_fails, bool circular_buffer)
>> +{
>> + u8 itap = 0, start_fail = 0, end_fail = 0, pass_length = 0;
>> + u8 first_fail_start = 0, last_fail_end = 0;
>> + struct device *dev = mmc_dev(host->mmc);
>> + struct window pass_window = {0, 0, 0};
>> + int prev_fail_end = -1;
>> +
>
> Unnecessary blank line
Will remove for v4.
>
>> + u8 i;
>> +
>> + if (!num_fails)
>> + return ITAPDLY_LAST_INDEX >> 1;
>> +
>> + if (fail_window->length == ITAPDLY_LENGTH) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "No passing ITAPDLY, return 0\n");
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + first_fail_start = fail_window->start;
>> + last_fail_end = fail_window[num_fails - 1].end;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_fails; i++) {
>> + start_fail = fail_window[i].start;
>> + end_fail = fail_window[i].end;
>> + pass_length = start_fail - (prev_fail_end + 1);
>> +
>> + if (pass_length > pass_window.length) {
>> + pass_window.start = prev_fail_end + 1;
>> + pass_window.length = pass_length;
>> + }
>> + prev_fail_end = end_fail;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!circular_buffer)
>> + pass_length = ITAPDLY_LAST_INDEX - last_fail_end;
>> + else
>> + pass_length = ITAPDLY_LAST_INDEX - last_fail_end + first_fail_start;
>> +
>> + if (pass_length > pass_window.length) {
>> + pass_window.start = last_fail_end + 1;
>> + pass_window.length = pass_length;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!circular_buffer)
>> + itap = pass_window.start + (pass_window.length >> 1);
>> + else
>> + itap = (pass_window.start + (pass_window.length >> 1)) % ITAPDLY_LENGTH;
>> +
>> + return (itap > ITAPDLY_LAST_INDEX) ? ITAPDLY_LAST_INDEX >> 1 : itap;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int sdhci_am654_platform_execute_tuning(struct sdhci_host *host,
>> u32 opcode)
>> {
>> struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
>> struct sdhci_am654_data *sdhci_am654 = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
>> - int cur_val, prev_val = 1, fail_len = 0, pass_window = 0, pass_len;
>> - u32 itap;
>> + struct window fail_window[ITAPDLY_LENGTH];
>> + u8 curr_pass, itap;
>> + u8 fail_index = 0;
>> + u8 prev_pass = 1;
>> +
>> + memset(fail_window, 0, sizeof(fail_window));
>>
>> /* Enable ITAPDLY */
>> regmap_update_bits(sdhci_am654->base, PHY_CTRL4, ITAPDLYENA_MASK,
>> 1 << ITAPDLYENA_SHIFT);
>>
>> - for (itap = 0; itap < ITAP_MAX; itap++) {
>> + for (itap = 0; itap < ITAPDLY_LENGTH; itap++) {
>> sdhci_am654_write_itapdly(sdhci_am654, itap);
>>
>> - cur_val = !mmc_send_tuning(host->mmc, opcode, NULL);
>> - if (cur_val && !prev_val)
>> - pass_window = itap;
>> + curr_pass = !mmc_send_tuning(host->mmc, opcode, NULL);
>>
>> - if (!cur_val)
>> - fail_len++;
>> + if (!curr_pass && prev_pass)
>> + fail_window[fail_index].start = itap;
>>
>> - prev_val = cur_val;
>> + if (!curr_pass) {
>> + fail_window[fail_index].end = itap;
>> + fail_window[fail_index].length++;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (curr_pass && !prev_pass)
>> + fail_index++;
>> +
>> + prev_pass = curr_pass;
>> }
>> - /*
>> - * Having determined the length of the failing window and start of
>> - * the passing window calculate the length of the passing window and
>> - * set the final value halfway through it considering the range as a
>> - * circular buffer
>> - */
>> - pass_len = ITAP_MAX - fail_len;
>> - itap = (pass_window + (pass_len >> 1)) % ITAP_MAX;
>> +
>> + if (fail_window[fail_index].length != 0)
>> + fail_index++;
>> +
>> + itap = sdhci_am654_calculate_itap(host, fail_window, fail_index,
>> + sdhci_am654->dll_enable);
>> +
>> sdhci_am654_write_itapdly(sdhci_am654, itap);
>>
>> return 0;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists