[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <171077537978.2168000.7565900207355472778.b4-ty@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 16:22:59 +0100
From: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
To: Phong LE <ple@...libre.com>, Sui Jingfeng <sui.jingfeng@...ux.dev>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>, Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ite66121: Register HPD interrupt handler
only when 'client->irq > 0'
Hi,
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 00:05:36 +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> If a specific design doesn't wire IT66121's interrupt signal output pin up
> to the display controller side, then we should not register the interrupt
> handler. Such a decision is valid usage, as we can fall back to polling
> mode. So, don't make the assumption that a specific board always supports
> HPD. Carry out a sanity check on 'client->irq' before using it, fall back
> to polling mode if client->irq < 0 is true. Such a design increases the
> overall flexibility.
>
> [...]
Thanks, Applied to https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/misc/kernel.git (drm-misc-next)
[1/1] drm/bridge: ite66121: Register HPD interrupt handler only when 'client->irq > 0'
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/misc/kernel/-/commit/ba2d3e6709681b6c16ba8d65a23d72c706d82b5c
--
Neil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists