lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <vuyzqntyhzz5at5q7rxkix6ogavow4kltge26q62ihzhsblsuv@o43un23zaf4w>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 22:18:25 -0500
From: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
To: Maulik Shah <quic_mkshah@...cinc.com>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, 
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, quic_eberman@...cinc.com, 
	quic_collinsd@...cinc.com, quic_lsrao@...cinc.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] soc: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Enhance check for VRM in-flight
 request

On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 10:55:44AM +0530, Maulik Shah wrote:
> Each RPMh VRM accelerator resource has 3 or 4 contiguous 4-byte aligned
> addresses associated with it. These control voltage, enable state, mode,
> and in legacy targets, voltage headroom. The current in-flight request
> checking logic looks for exact address matches. Requests for different
> addresses of the same RPMh resource as thus not detected as in-flight.
> 
> Add new cmd-db API cmd_db_match_resource_addr() to enhance the in-flight
> request check for VRM requests by ignoring the address offset.
> 
> This ensures that only one request is allowed to be in-flight for a given
> VRM resource. This is needed to avoid scenarios where request commands are
> carried out by RPMh hardware out-of-order leading to LDO regulator
> over-current protection triggering.
> 
> Fixes: 658628e7ef78 ("drivers: qcom: rpmh-rsc: add RPMH controller for QCOM SoCs")
> cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
> Tested-by: Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@...cinc.com> # sm8650-qrd
> Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <quic_mkshah@...cinc.com>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - Simplify cmd_db_match_resource_addr()
> - Remove unrelated changes to newly added logic
> - Update function description comments

You changed things, but retained Konrad's Reviewed-by...

> - Replace Signed-off-by: with Tested-by: from Elliot

Did Elliot test v4, or did you just translate his incorrect(?) s-o-b
from v1 into a tested-by?

We're about to write into the git history that Elliot says this version
is tested to the best of his abilities...

> - Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212-rpmh-rsc-fixes-v3-1-1be0d705dbb5@quicinc.com
> Changes in v3:
> - Fix s-o-b chain
> - Add cmd-db API to compare addresses
> - Reuse already defined resource types in cmd-db
> - Add Fixes tag and Cc to stable
> - Retain Reviewed-by tag of v2
> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240119-rpmh-rsc-fixes-v2-1-e42c0a9e36f0@quicinc.com
> Changes in v2:
> - Use GENMASK() and FIELD_GET()
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240117-rpmh-rsc-fixes-v1-1-71ee4f8f72a4@quicinc.com
> ---
>  drivers/soc/qcom/cmd-db.c   | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c |  3 ++-
>  include/soc/qcom/cmd-db.h   | 10 +++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/cmd-db.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/cmd-db.c
> index a5fd68411bed..86fb2cd4f484 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/cmd-db.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/cmd-db.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,10 @@
>  /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> -/* Copyright (c) 2016-2018, 2020, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2016-2018, 2020, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> + * Copyright (c) 2024, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
> + */
>  
> +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
>  #include <linux/debugfs.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
> @@ -17,6 +21,8 @@
>  #define MAX_SLV_ID		8
>  #define SLAVE_ID_MASK		0x7
>  #define SLAVE_ID_SHIFT		16
> +#define SLAVE_ID(addr)		FIELD_GET(GENMASK(19, 16), addr)
> +#define VRM_ADDR(addr)		FIELD_GET(GENMASK(19, 4), addr)
>  
>  /**
>   * struct entry_header: header for each entry in cmddb
> @@ -220,6 +226,30 @@ const void *cmd_db_read_aux_data(const char *id, size_t *len)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cmd_db_read_aux_data);
>  
> +/**
> + * cmd_db_match_resource_addr() - Compare if both Resource addresses are same
> + *
> + * @addr1: Resource address to compare
> + * @addr2: Resource address to compare
> + *
> + * Return: true if two addresses refer to the same resource, false otherwise
> + */
> +bool cmd_db_match_resource_addr(u32 addr1, u32 addr2)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * Each RPMh VRM accelerator resource has 3 or 4 contiguous 4-byte
> +	 * aligned addresses associated with it. Ignore the offset to check
> +	 * for VRM requests.
> +	 */
> +	if (addr1 == addr2)
> +		return true;
> +	else if (SLAVE_ID(addr1) == CMD_DB_HW_VRM && VRM_ADDR(addr1) == VRM_ADDR(addr2))

Is it a fact or a coincidence that GENMASK(19, 16) of the address
happens to have the same value as the associated rsc_hdr's slv_id?


I recognize that we probably don't want to start naively traversing the
headers here, but as previously requested I would still like to have an
interface where I can pass in an address and have its entry_header->id
resolved, for tracing/debug purposes. Perhaps there's some common
ground?

Regards,
Bjorn

> +		return true;
> +
> +	return false;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cmd_db_match_resource_addr);
> +
>  /**
>   * cmd_db_read_slave_id - Get the slave ID for a given resource address
>   *
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
> index a021dc71807b..daf64be966fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>  /*
>   * Copyright (c) 2016-2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> + * Copyright (c) 2023-2024, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
>   */
>  
>  #define pr_fmt(fmt) "%s " fmt, KBUILD_MODNAME
> @@ -557,7 +558,7 @@ static int check_for_req_inflight(struct rsc_drv *drv, struct tcs_group *tcs,
>  		for_each_set_bit(j, &curr_enabled, MAX_CMDS_PER_TCS) {
>  			addr = read_tcs_cmd(drv, drv->regs[RSC_DRV_CMD_ADDR], i, j);
>  			for (k = 0; k < msg->num_cmds; k++) {
> -				if (addr == msg->cmds[k].addr)
> +				if (cmd_db_match_resource_addr(msg->cmds[k].addr, addr))
>  					return -EBUSY;
>  			}
>  		}
> diff --git a/include/soc/qcom/cmd-db.h b/include/soc/qcom/cmd-db.h
> index c8bb56e6852a..47a6cab75e63 100644
> --- a/include/soc/qcom/cmd-db.h
> +++ b/include/soc/qcom/cmd-db.h
> @@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
>  /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> -/* Copyright (c) 2016-2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2016-2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> + * Copyright (c) 2024, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
> + */
>  
>  #ifndef __QCOM_COMMAND_DB_H__
>  #define __QCOM_COMMAND_DB_H__
> @@ -21,6 +24,8 @@ u32 cmd_db_read_addr(const char *resource_id);
>  
>  const void *cmd_db_read_aux_data(const char *resource_id, size_t *len);
>  
> +bool cmd_db_match_resource_addr(u32 addr1, u32 addr2);
> +
>  enum cmd_db_hw_type cmd_db_read_slave_id(const char *resource_id);
>  
>  int cmd_db_ready(void);
> @@ -31,6 +36,9 @@ static inline u32 cmd_db_read_addr(const char *resource_id)
>  static inline const void *cmd_db_read_aux_data(const char *resource_id, size_t *len)
>  { return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); }
>  
> +static inline bool cmd_db_match_resource_addr(u32 addr1, u32 addr2)
> +{ return false; }
> +
>  static inline enum cmd_db_hw_type cmd_db_read_slave_id(const char *resource_id)
>  { return -ENODEV; }
>  
> 
> ---
> base-commit: 615d300648869c774bd1fe54b4627bb0c20faed4
> change-id: 20240210-rpmh-rsc-fixes-372a79ab364b
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Maulik Shah <quic_mkshah@...cinc.com>
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ