| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20240318174110.GK13682@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 19:41:10 +0200
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...ux.dev>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] drm: zynqmp_dp: Split off several helper functions
Hi Sean,
Thank you for the patch.
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 07:09:14PM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
> In preparation for supporting compliance testing, split off several
> helper functions. No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...ux.dev>
> ---
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/zynqmp_dp.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/zynqmp_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/zynqmp_dp.c
> index d2dee58e7bf2..24043847dab4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/zynqmp_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/zynqmp_dp.c
> @@ -627,6 +627,7 @@ static void zynqmp_dp_adjust_train(struct zynqmp_dp *dp,
> /**
> * zynqmp_dp_update_vs_emph - Update the training values
> * @dp: DisplayPort IP core structure
> + * @train_set: A set of training values
> *
> * Update the training values based on the request from sink. The mapped values
> * are predefined, and values(vs, pe, pc) are from the device manual.
> @@ -634,12 +635,12 @@ static void zynqmp_dp_adjust_train(struct zynqmp_dp *dp,
> * Return: 0 if vs and emph are updated successfully, or the error code returned
> * by drm_dp_dpcd_write().
> */
> -static int zynqmp_dp_update_vs_emph(struct zynqmp_dp *dp)
> +static int zynqmp_dp_update_vs_emph(struct zynqmp_dp *dp, u8 *train_set)
> {
> unsigned int i;
> int ret;
>
> - ret = drm_dp_dpcd_write(&dp->aux, DP_TRAINING_LANE0_SET, dp->train_set,
> + ret = drm_dp_dpcd_write(&dp->aux, DP_TRAINING_LANE0_SET, train_set,
> dp->mode.lane_cnt);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
> @@ -647,7 +648,7 @@ static int zynqmp_dp_update_vs_emph(struct zynqmp_dp *dp)
> for (i = 0; i < dp->mode.lane_cnt; i++) {
> u32 reg = ZYNQMP_DP_SUB_TX_PHY_PRECURSOR_LANE_0 + i * 4;
> union phy_configure_opts opts = { 0 };
> - u8 train = dp->train_set[i];
> + u8 train = train_set[i];
>
> opts.dp.voltage[0] = (train & DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_MASK)
> >> DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_SHIFT;
> @@ -691,7 +692,7 @@ static int zynqmp_dp_link_train_cr(struct zynqmp_dp *dp)
> * So, This loop should exit before 512 iterations
> */
> for (max_tries = 0; max_tries < 512; max_tries++) {
> - ret = zynqmp_dp_update_vs_emph(dp);
> + ret = zynqmp_dp_update_vs_emph(dp, dp->train_set);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -756,7 +757,7 @@ static int zynqmp_dp_link_train_ce(struct zynqmp_dp *dp)
> return ret;
>
> for (tries = 0; tries < DP_MAX_TRAINING_TRIES; tries++) {
> - ret = zynqmp_dp_update_vs_emph(dp);
> + ret = zynqmp_dp_update_vs_emph(dp, dp->train_set);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -779,28 +780,28 @@ static int zynqmp_dp_link_train_ce(struct zynqmp_dp *dp)
> }
>
> /**
> - * zynqmp_dp_train - Train the link
> - * @dp: DisplayPort IP core structure
> + * zynqmp_dp_setup() - Set up major link parameters
> + * @bw_code: The link bandwidth as a multiple of 270 MHz
> + * @lane_cnt: The number of lanes to use
> + * @enhanced: Use enhanced framing
> + * @downspread: Enable spread-spectrum clocking
> *
> - * Return: 0 if all trains are done successfully, or corresponding error code.
> + * Return: 0 on success, or -errno on failure
> */
> -static int zynqmp_dp_train(struct zynqmp_dp *dp)
> +static int zynqmp_dp_setup(struct zynqmp_dp *dp, u8 bw_code, u8 lane_cnt,
> + bool enhanced, bool downspread)
> {
> u32 reg;
> - u8 bw_code = dp->mode.bw_code;
> - u8 lane_cnt = dp->mode.lane_cnt;
> u8 aux_lane_cnt = lane_cnt;
> - bool enhanced;
> int ret;
>
> zynqmp_dp_write(dp, ZYNQMP_DP_LANE_COUNT_SET, lane_cnt);
> - enhanced = drm_dp_enhanced_frame_cap(dp->dpcd);
> if (enhanced) {
> zynqmp_dp_write(dp, ZYNQMP_DP_ENHANCED_FRAME_EN, 1);
> aux_lane_cnt |= DP_LANE_COUNT_ENHANCED_FRAME_EN;
> }
>
> - if (dp->dpcd[3] & 0x1) {
> + if (downspread) {
> zynqmp_dp_write(dp, ZYNQMP_DP_DOWNSPREAD_CTL, 1);
> drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&dp->aux, DP_DOWNSPREAD_CTRL,
> DP_SPREAD_AMP_0_5);
> @@ -843,8 +844,24 @@ static int zynqmp_dp_train(struct zynqmp_dp *dp)
> }
>
> zynqmp_dp_write(dp, ZYNQMP_DP_PHY_CLOCK_SELECT, reg);
> - ret = zynqmp_dp_phy_ready(dp);
> - if (ret < 0)
> + return zynqmp_dp_phy_ready(dp);
> +}
> +
> +
> +/**
> + * zynqmp_dp_train - Train the link
> + * @dp: DisplayPort IP core structure
> + *
> + * Return: 0 if all trains are done successfully, or corresponding error code.
> + */
> +static int zynqmp_dp_train(struct zynqmp_dp *dp)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = zynqmp_dp_setup(dp, dp->mode.bw_code, dp->mode.lane_cnt,
> + drm_dp_enhanced_frame_cap(dp->dpcd),
> + dp->dpcd[3] & 0x1);
This patch looks OK. Assuming you make correct use of the new functions
in the next patches,
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
On a side note, I think the above could be written
ret = zynqmp_dp_setup(dp, dp->mode.bw_code, dp->mode.lane_cnt,
drm_dp_enhanced_frame_cap(dp->dpcd),
dp->dpcd[DP_MAX_DOWNSPREAD] & DP_MAX_DOWNSPREAD_0_5);
> + if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> zynqmp_dp_write(dp, ZYNQMP_DP_SCRAMBLING_DISABLE, 1);
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists