linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC kspp-next 0/3] compiler_types: add Endianness-dependent __counted_by

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202403181038.EC9DF8CE3C@keescook>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 10:49:25 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
Cc: linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
	Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC kspp-next 0/3] compiler_types: add
 Endianness-dependent __counted_by_{le,be}

On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 02:03:51PM +0100, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
>  include/linux/compiler_types.h              | 11 ++++++++++
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/virtchnl2.h | 24 ++++++++++-----------
>  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Oh, I see the Subject says "kspp-next" -- normally I'd expect things
touch net to go through netdev. I'm fine with this going through either
tree. Perhaps better through netdev since that subsystem has the most
users and may gain more using the new macros?

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook