[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f5ukvah2ujko2iht3pd5jxq5kaukbs5z3pn5s7qwcnx4aqr3yv@mwtbwkcfa44a>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 19:16:14 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Nylon Chen <nylon.chen@...ive.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, conor@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, palmer@...belt.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, thierry.reding@...il.com, vincent.chen@...ive.com,
zong.li@...ive.com, nylon7717@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/3] pwm: sifive: change the PWM algorithm
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 04:12:30PM +0800, Nylon Chen wrote:
> The `frac` variable represents the pulse inactive time, and the result
> of this algorithm is the pulse active time.
> Therefore, we must reverse the result.
>
> The reference is SiFive FU740-C000 Manual[0]
>
> Link: https://sifive.cdn.prismic.io/sifive/1a82e600-1f93-4f41-b2d8-86ed8b16acba_fu740-c000-manual-v1p6.pdf [0]
>
> Co-developed-by: Zong Li <zong.li@...ive.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zong Li <zong.li@...ive.com>
> Co-developed-by: Vincent Chen <vincent.chen@...ive.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Chen <vincent.chen@...ive.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nylon Chen <nylon.chen@...ive.com>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c
> index eabddb7c7820..a586cfe4191b 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c
> @@ -110,9 +110,10 @@ static int pwm_sifive_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> struct pwm_state *state)
> {
> struct pwm_sifive_ddata *ddata = pwm_sifive_chip_to_ddata(chip);
> - u32 duty, val;
> + u32 duty, val, inactive;
>
> - duty = readl(ddata->regs + PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCMP(pwm->hwpwm));
> + inactive = readl(ddata->regs + PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCMP(pwm->hwpwm));
> + duty = (1U << PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH) - 1 - inactive;
>
> state->enabled = duty > 0;
>
> @@ -123,7 +124,7 @@ static int pwm_sifive_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> state->period = ddata->real_period;
> state->duty_cycle =
> (u64)duty * ddata->real_period >> PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH;
> - state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED;
> + state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -139,7 +140,7 @@ static int pwm_sifive_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> int ret = 0;
> u32 frac;
>
> - if (state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED)
> + if (state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> cur_state = pwm->state;
> @@ -159,6 +160,7 @@ static int pwm_sifive_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> frac = DIV64_U64_ROUND_CLOSEST(num, state->period);
> /* The hardware cannot generate a 100% duty cycle */
Is this still true now that we know that PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCMP is the
inactive time in a period? If you fix that, the same claim in the header
of the driver needs adaption, too.
> frac = min(frac, (1U << PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH) - 1);
> + frac = (1U << PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH) - 1 - frac;
I like the additional variable in pwm_sifive_get_state(). Can you please
add one here, too?
> mutex_lock(&ddata->lock);
> if (state->period != ddata->approx_period) {
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists