[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZfiFMr8s68cf2uac@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 18:17:22 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"Christoph Lameter (Ampere)" <cl@...two.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com,
Matteo.Carlini@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
anshuman.khandual@....com, Eric Mackay <eric.mackay@...cle.com>,
dave.kleikamp@...cle.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux@...linux.org.uk, robin.murphy@....com,
vanshikonda@...amperecomputing.com, yang@...amperecomputing.com,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM64: Dynamically allocate cpumasks and increase
supported CPUs to 512
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 07:07:07PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Mar 2024 17:45:04 -0800, Christoph Lameter (Ampere) wrote:
> > Currently defconfig selects NR_CPUS=256, but some vendors (e.g. Ampere
> > Computing) are planning to ship systems with 512 CPUs. So that all CPUs on
> > these systems can be used with defconfig, we'd like to bump NR_CPUS to 512.
> > Therefore this patch increases the default NR_CPUS from 256 to 512.
> >
> > As increasing NR_CPUS will increase the size of cpumasks, there's a fear that
> > this might have a significant impact on stack usage due to code which places
> > cpumasks on the stack. To mitigate that concern, we can select
> > CPUMASK_OFFSTACK. As that doesn't seem to be a problem today with
> > NR_CPUS=256, we only select this when NR_CPUS > 256.
> >
> > [...]
>
> Applied to arm64 (for-next/misc), thanks!
>
> I dropped the config entry and comment, replaced it with a select as per
> Mark's suggestion.
>
> [1/1] ARM64: Dynamically allocate cpumasks and increase supported CPUs to 512
> https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/0499a78369ad
I re-instated this patch in arm64 for-next/core as:
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/3fbd56f0e7c1
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists