| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 19:50:44 +0100
From: Petr Tesařík <petr@...arici.cz>
To: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@...look.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Marek Szyprowski
<m.szyprowski@...sung.com>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, Petr
Tesarik <petr.tesarik1@...wei-partners.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "open list:DMA MAPPING HELPERS"
<iommu@...ts.linux.dev>, Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...weicloud.com>,
Petr Tesarik <petrtesarik@...weicloud.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] swiotlb: extend buffer pre-padding to
alloc_align_mask if necessary
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 15:37:16 +0000
Michael Kelley <mhklinux@...look.com> wrote:
> From: Petr Tesarik <petrtesarik@...weicloud.com> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2024 6:05 AM
> >
> > Allow a buffer pre-padding of up to alloc_align_mask. If the allocation
> > alignment is bigger than IO_TLB_SIZE and min_align_mask covers any non-zero
> > bits in the original address between IO_TLB_SIZE and alloc_align_mask,
> > these bits are not preserved in the swiotlb buffer address.
> >
> > To fix this case, increase the allocation size and use a larger offset
> > within the allocated buffer. As a result, extra padding slots may be
> > allocated before the mapping start address.
> >
> > Set the orig_addr in these padding slots to INVALID_PHYS_ADDR, because they
> > do not correspond to any CPU buffer and the data must never be synced.
>
> This paragraph is now obsolete.
Right. It should now say that orig_addr already _is_ set to
INVALID_PHYS_ADDR, so attempts to sync data will be ignored.
> >
> > The padding slots should be automatically released when the buffer is
> > unmapped. However, swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single() takes only the address of the
> > DMA buffer slot, not the first padding slot. Save the number of padding
> > slots in struct io_tlb_slot and use it to adjust the slot index in
> > swiotlb_release_slots(), so all allocated slots are properly freed.
> >
> > Fixes: 2fd4fa5d3fb5 ("swiotlb: Fix alignment checks when both allocation and DMA masks are present")
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20240311210507.217daf8b@meshulam.tesarici.cz/
> > Signed-off-by: Petr Tesarik <petr.tesarik1@...wei-partners.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> > index 86fe172b5958..aefb05ff55e7 100644
> > --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> > +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> > @@ -69,11 +69,14 @@
> > * @alloc_size: Size of the allocated buffer.
> > * @list: The free list describing the number of free entries available
> > * from each index.
> > + * @pad_slots: Number of preceding padding slots. Valid only in the first
> > + * allocated non-padding slot.
> > */
> > struct io_tlb_slot {
> > phys_addr_t orig_addr;
> > size_t alloc_size;
> > - unsigned int list;
> > + unsigned short list;
> > + unsigned short pad_slots;
> > };
> >
> > static bool swiotlb_force_bounce;
> > @@ -287,6 +290,7 @@ static void swiotlb_init_io_tlb_pool(struct io_tlb_pool *mem, phys_addr_t start,
> > mem->nslabs - i);
> > mem->slots[i].orig_addr = INVALID_PHYS_ADDR;
> > mem->slots[i].alloc_size = 0;
> > + mem->slots[i].pad_slots = 0;
> > }
> >
> > memset(vaddr, 0, bytes);
> > @@ -1328,11 +1332,12 @@ phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t orig_addr,
> > unsigned long attrs)
> > {
> > struct io_tlb_mem *mem = dev->dma_io_tlb_mem;
> > - unsigned int offset = swiotlb_align_offset(dev, orig_addr);
> > + unsigned int offset;
> > struct io_tlb_pool *pool;
> > unsigned int i;
> > int index;
> > phys_addr_t tlb_addr;
> > + unsigned short pad_slots;
> >
> > if (!mem || !mem->nslabs) {
> > dev_warn_ratelimited(dev,
> > @@ -1349,6 +1354,15 @@ phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t orig_addr,
> > return (phys_addr_t)DMA_MAPPING_ERROR;
> > }
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Calculate buffer pre-padding within the allocated space. Use it to
> > + * preserve the low bits of the original address according to device's
> > + * min_align_mask. Limit the padding to alloc_align_mask or slot size
> > + * (whichever is bigger); higher bits of the original address are
> > + * preserved by selecting a suitable IO TLB slot.
> > + */
> > + offset = orig_addr & dma_get_min_align_mask(dev) &
> > + (alloc_align_mask | (IO_TLB_SIZE - 1));
> > index = swiotlb_find_slots(dev, orig_addr,
> > alloc_size + offset, alloc_align_mask, &pool);
> > if (index == -1) {
> > @@ -1364,6 +1378,10 @@ phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t orig_addr,
> > * This is needed when we sync the memory. Then we sync the buffer if
> > * needed.
> > */
> > + pad_slots = offset / IO_TLB_SIZE;
> > + offset %= IO_TLB_SIZE;
> > + index += pad_slots;
> > + pool->slots[index].pad_slots = i;
>
> The above line should be:
> pool->slots[index].pad_slots = pad_slots;
Doh. Yes, I rewrote it a few times and then forgot to change this.
How did it even pass the test suite?
Thank you for the review.
Petr T
> > for (i = 0; i < nr_slots(alloc_size + offset); i++)
> > pool->slots[index + i].orig_addr = slot_addr(orig_addr, i);
> > tlb_addr = slot_addr(pool->start, index) + offset;
> > @@ -1385,12 +1403,16 @@ static void swiotlb_release_slots(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr)
> > struct io_tlb_pool *mem = swiotlb_find_pool(dev, tlb_addr);
> > unsigned long flags;
> > unsigned int offset = swiotlb_align_offset(dev, tlb_addr);
> > - int index = (tlb_addr - offset - mem->start) >> IO_TLB_SHIFT;
> > - int nslots = nr_slots(mem->slots[index].alloc_size + offset);
> > - int aindex = index / mem->area_nslabs;
> > - struct io_tlb_area *area = &mem->areas[aindex];
> > + int index, nslots, aindex;
> > + struct io_tlb_area *area;
> > int count, i;
> >
> > + index = (tlb_addr - offset - mem->start) >> IO_TLB_SHIFT;
> > + index -= mem->slots[index].pad_slots;
> > + nslots = nr_slots(mem->slots[index].alloc_size + offset);
> > + aindex = index / mem->area_nslabs;
> > + area = &mem->areas[aindex];
> > +
> > /*
> > * Return the buffer to the free list by setting the corresponding
> > * entries to indicate the number of contiguous entries available.
> > @@ -1413,6 +1435,7 @@ static void swiotlb_release_slots(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr)
> > mem->slots[i].list = ++count;
> > mem->slots[i].orig_addr = INVALID_PHYS_ADDR;
> > mem->slots[i].alloc_size = 0;
> > + mem->slots[i].pad_slots = 0;
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > --
> > 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists