linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/31] Clean up thermal zone polling-delay

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 17:43:28 +0100
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/31] Clean up thermal zone polling-delay

On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 05:13:30PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> A trivial follow-up on the changes introduced in Commit 488164006a28
> ("thermal/of: Assume polling-delay(-passive) 0 when absent").
> 
> Should probably wait until v6.9-rc1 so that the patch in question is
> in the base tree, otherwise TZs will fail to register.
> 
> FWIW, Compile-tested only (except 8280).

Please provide some more details on how you verified these patches (or
that patch).

Last time you said you just checked that the interrupt counters were
incremented, which is not sufficient.

Johan