[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZfnXcbd3h3Rj4IIS@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 18:20:33 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Gregory Price <gregory.price@...verge.com>
Cc: Gregory Price <gourry.memverge@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ying.huang@...el.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com, honggyu.kim@...com,
corbet@....net, arnd@...db.de, luto@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 3/3] ktest: sys_move_phys_pages ktest
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 02:14:33PM -0400, Gregory Price wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 05:52:46PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 01:26:09PM -0400, Gregory Price wrote:
> > > Implement simple ktest that looks up the physical address via
> > > /proc/self/pagemap and migrates the page based on that information.
> >
> > What? LOL. No.
> >
>
> Certainly the test is stupid and requires admin, but I could not
> come up an easier test to demonstrate the concept - and the docs
> say to include a test with all syscall proposals.
>
> Am I missing something else important?
> (stupid question: of course I am, but alas I must ask it)
It's not that the test is stupid. It's the concept that's stupid.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists