[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240319182127.Sl43cYr2@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:21:27 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Locking: Let PREEMPT_RT compile again with new rwsem
asserts.
On 2024-03-19 16:01:26 [+0000], Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> I see Waiman already gave you the substantial answer ... but why did you
> change inline to __always_inline?
To align with the all the other functions in the file which were defined
like that.
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists