[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7chUL9P5xBqezArz5sh4e+PFemCPCPt+a+PphGXJJYjRmw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 13:34:05 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, linux-toolchains@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/23] perf annotate-data: Maintain variable type info
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 11:12 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 10:44:31AM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 7:07 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > +void exit_type_state(struct type_state *state)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct type_state_stack *stack, *tmp;
> > > > +
> > > > + list_for_each_entry_safe(stack, tmp, &state->stack_vars, list) {
> > > > + list_del(&stack->list);
>
> > > list_del_init()?
>
> > Maybe.. but I'm not sure how much value it'd have as we free it right after.
>
> Usually the value is in catching use after free more quickly, i.e.
> someone may have a pointer to a freed list and then it would be able to
> traverse the list of freed elements.
Ok, then. :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists