lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240319222755.GA2005262@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 15:27:55 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: mhiramat@...nel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
	ndesaulniers@...gle.com, morbo@...gle.com, justinstitt@...gle.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	llvm@...ts.linux.dev, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
	Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing: Fully silence instance of -Wstring-compare

On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 06:15:09PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 09:07:51 -0700
> Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > This series fully resolves the new instance of -Wstring-compare from
> > within the __assign_str() macro. The first patch resolves a build
> > failure with GCC that would be seen with just the second patch applied.
> > The second patch actually hides the warning.
> > 
> > NOTE: This is based on trace/for-next, which does not contain the
> > minimum LLVM version bump that occurred later in the current merge
> > window, so this uses
> > 
> >   __diag_ignore(clang, 11, ...
> > 
> > instead of
> > 
> >   __diag_ignore(clang, 13, ...
> > 
> > which will be required when this is merged into Linus's tree. If you can
> > base this series on a tree that has the merge commit e5eb28f6d1af ("Merge
> > tag 'mm-nonmm-stable-2024-03-14-09-36' of
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm") in it, then that
> > change can be done at application time, rather than merge time (or I can
> > send a v2). It would be really nice for this to make the merge window so
> > that this warning does not proliferate into other trees that base on
> > -rc1.
> > 
> 
> I'm guessing this isn't needed with the last update.

Correct, this is resolved in Linus's tree and should be in -next
tomorrow. The first patch may be worth sending standalone, I'll think
about sending it later but that can go in via some other tree, not
yours.

Cheers,
Nathan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ