[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2fbb3c68-568d-40f5-9f48-139db9a1d7f9@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 06:40:11 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@....com>, Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
michal.simek@....com, ben.levinsky@....com,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: add Versal platform support
On 19/03/2024 01:37, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for reviews, please find my comments below.
>
> On 3/17/24 9:50 AM, Conor Dooley wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 02:15:31PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
>>> AMD-Xilinx Versal platform is successor of ZynqMP platform. Real-time
>>> Processor Unit R5 cluster IP on Versal is same as of ZynqMP Platform.
>>
>>> Only difference is power-domains ID needed by power management firmware.
>>> Hence, keeping the compatible property same as of zynqmp node.
>>
>> No, don't be lazy. Add a compatible with a fallback please.
>
> It's same IP on different platform. I am not sure how adding compatible string
> adds value. I will refactor this series based on other comments provided.
Judging by your other thread, it would add value. Also writing bindings
asks you for this.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists