[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA8EJpq+PUavezxAwpStm98_3uW7HQraFyUdr6uwZCNHJ4yU5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 02:09:36 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7@...il.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] clk: qcom: apss-ipq-pll: use an 1-D array for Huayra
pll register offsets
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 at 23:23, Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7@...il.com> wrote:
>
> 2024. 03. 18. 15:16 keltezéssel, Dmitry Baryshkov írta:
>
> ...
>
> >> +static const u8 ipq_pll_huayra_regs[PLL_OFF_MAX_REGS] = {
> >> + [PLL_OFF_L_VAL] = 0x08,
> >> + [PLL_OFF_ALPHA_VAL] = 0x10,
> >> + [PLL_OFF_USER_CTL] = 0x18,
> >> + [PLL_OFF_CONFIG_CTL] = 0x20,
> >> + [PLL_OFF_CONFIG_CTL_U] = 0x24,
> >> + [PLL_OFF_STATUS] = 0x28,
> >> + [PLL_OFF_TEST_CTL] = 0x30,
> >> + [PLL_OFF_TEST_CTL_U] = 0x34,
> >> };
> >
> > Can you please move this to clk_alpha_pll? We can then drop it from
> > clk-cbf-8996.c too.
>
> Sure, I can do that. By any chance, do you have a suggestion for the name of the
> new enum value to be used in the clk_alpha_pll_regs array?
>
> CLK_ALPHA_PLL_TYPE_HUAYRA_IPQ seems too generic, and it would be a bit
> misleading using that for MSM8996 CBF.
>
> CLK_ALPHA_PLL_TYPE_HUAYRA_IPQ6018_A53 is quite long and it is also misleading.
>
> Maybe we could use CLK_ALPHA_PLL_TYPE_IPQ6018_A53 which is short and unique
> enough and we could add an alias for that like CLK_ALPHA_PLL_TYPE_MSM8996_CBF or
> something similar.
HUAYRA_APSS ?
>
> Regards,
> Gabor
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists