[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<CYYPR12MB8655911DBA1E09CDC606E3F99C2C2@CYYPR12MB8655.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 08:03:27 +0000
From: "Yuan, Perry" <Perry.Yuan@....com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
CC: "rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>, "Limonciello,
Mario" <Mario.Limonciello@....com>, "viresh.kumar@...aro.org"
<viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, "Huang, Ray" <Ray.Huang@....com>, "Shenoy, Gautham
Ranjal" <gautham.shenoy@....com>, "Petkov, Borislav"
<Borislav.Petkov@....com>, "Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@....com>,
"Huang, Shimmer" <Shimmer.Huang@....com>, "Du, Xiaojian"
<Xiaojian.Du@....com>, "Meng, Li (Jassmine)" <Li.Meng@....com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 1/8] cpufreq: amd-pstate: Document *_limit_* fields in
struct amd_cpudata
[AMD Official Use Only - General]
Hi Rafael,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2024 8:35 PM
> To: Yuan, Perry <Perry.Yuan@....com>
> Cc: rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com; Limonciello, Mario
> <Mario.Limonciello@....com>; viresh.kumar@...aro.org; Huang, Ray
> <Ray.Huang@....com>; Shenoy, Gautham Ranjal
> <gautham.shenoy@....com>; Petkov, Borislav <Borislav.Petkov@....com>;
> Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@....com>; Huang, Shimmer
> <Shimmer.Huang@....com>; Du, Xiaojian <Xiaojian.Du@....com>; Meng,
> Li (Jassmine) <Li.Meng@....com>; linux-pm@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/8] cpufreq: amd-pstate: Document *_limit_* fields in
> struct amd_cpudata
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 10:48 AM Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@....com>
> wrote:
> >
> > From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>
>
> No changelog.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@....com>
>
> Sender sign-off missing (when sending a somebody else's patch, you need to
> add your S-o-b tag to it).
Got it, will fix this and other two patches flags missing in V9.
Thank you for the feedback.
Perry.
>
> > ---
> > include/linux/amd-pstate.h | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/amd-pstate.h b/include/linux/amd-pstate.h
> > index d21838835abd..212f377d615b 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/amd-pstate.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/amd-pstate.h
> > @@ -49,6 +49,10 @@ struct amd_aperf_mperf {
> > * @lowest_perf: the absolute lowest performance level of the processor
> > * @prefcore_ranking: the preferred core ranking, the higher value indicates
> a higher
> > * priority.
> > + * @min_limit_perf: Cached value of the perf corresponding to
> > + policy->min
> > + * @max_limit_perf: Cached value of the perf corresponding to
> > + policy->max
> > + * @min_limit_freq: Cached value of policy->min
> > + * @max_limit_freq: Cached value of policy->max
> > * @max_freq: the frequency that mapped to highest_perf
> > * @min_freq: the frequency that mapped to lowest_perf
> > * @nominal_freq: the frequency that mapped to nominal_perf
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists