[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <96d3951d-b349-41b8-aabb-a192ad48998f@web.de>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 09:16:29 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Ayush Singh <ayushdevel1325@...il.com>,
Vaishnav M A <vaishnav@...gleboard.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, lorforlinux@...gleboard.org,
greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Derek Kiernan <derek.kiernan@....com>, Dragan Cvetic
<dragan.cvetic@....com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jason Kridner <jkridner@...gleboard.org>, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Robert Nelson
<robertcnelson@...gleboard.org>, Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>,
Vaishnav M A <vaishnav.a@...com>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] spi: Make of_find_spi_controller_by_node()
available
> This externalizes and exports the symbol
> of_find_spi_controller_by_node() from the SPI core akin to how
> of_find_i2c_adapter_by_node() is already available. As we will
> need this also for non-dynamic OF setups, we move it under a
> CONFIG_OF check.
Would a change description be more desirable with a corresponding imperative wording?
See also:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.8#n94
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists