linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] media: uvc: Probe PLF limits at start-up

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240319084047.GA1041856@google.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 17:40:47 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] media: uvc: Probe PLF limits at start-up

On (24/03/18 23:55), Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> 
> The UVC standard descries the values for the PLF control for its
> versions 1.1 and and 1.5, but it does not describe which values MUST be
> implemented.
> 
> So far, we have been adding "device quirks" to provide proper limits for
> the control, but this is failing to scale.
> 
> Add a function that during probe-time checks the capability of the
> control.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>

Looks good to me

FWIW
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>