[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <89e76fa5834bd34ef94761bcbc987a1be245b261.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 02:14:56 +0200
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>
To: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov
<ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii@...nel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Song Liu
<song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, John Fastabend
<john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav
Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa
<jolsa@...nel.org>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>, Shuah Khan
<shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 6/6] selftests/bpf: add sleepable timer tests
On Fri, 2024-03-15 at 15:29 +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> bpf_experimental.h and ../bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h are both
> including vmlinux.h, which is not compatible with including time.h
> or bpf_tcp_helpers.h.
>
> So prevent vmlinux.h to be included, and override the few missing
> types.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@...nel.org>
[...]
> @@ -6,6 +6,14 @@
> #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> #include "bpf_tcp_helpers.h"
>
> +#define __VMLINUX_H__
> +#define u32 __u32
> +#define u64 __u64
> +#include "bpf_experimental.h"
> +struct prog_test_member1;
> +#include "../bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h"
> +#undef __VMLINUX_H__
Tbh, this looks very ugly.
Would it be possible to create a new tests file sleepable_timer.c
and include bpf_experimental.h there, skipping time.h?
It appears that for the new tests the only necessary definition from
time.h is CLOCK_MONOTONIC.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists