[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZflmU+H2Lt2I0VOq@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:17:55 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, acme@...nel.org,
namhyung@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de, bp@...en8.de,
seanjc@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, eranian@...gle.com,
irogers@...gle.com, ravi.bangoria@....com, ananth.narayan@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] x86/cpufeatures: Add dedicated feature word for
CPUID leaf 0x80000022[EAX]
* Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com> wrote:
> Move the existing scattered performance monitoring related feature bits
> from CPUID leaf 0x80000022[EAX] into a dedicated word since additional
> bits will be defined from the same leaf in the future. This includes
> X86_FEATURE_PERFMON_V2 and X86_FEATURE_AMD_LBR_V2.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 7 +++++--
> arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 10 +++++++---
> arch/x86/include/asm/disabled-features.h | 3 ++-
> arch/x86/include/asm/required-features.h | 3 ++-
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 3 +++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c | 2 --
> arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 5 +----
> arch/x86/kvm/reverse_cpuid.h | 1 -
> 8 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> index a1273698fc43..68dd27d60748 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ enum cpuid_leafs
> CPUID_7_EDX,
> CPUID_8000_001F_EAX,
> CPUID_8000_0021_EAX,
> + CPUID_8000_0022_EAX,
> #define X86_FEATURE_SYSCALL32 ( 3*32+14) /* "" syscall in IA32 userspace */
> #define X86_FEATURE_SYSENTER32 ( 3*32+15) /* "" sysenter in IA32 userspace */
> #define X86_FEATURE_REP_GOOD ( 3*32+16) /* REP microcode works well */
> -#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_LBR_V2 ( 3*32+17) /* AMD Last Branch Record Extension Version 2 */
> +/* FREE! ( 3*32+17) */
> #define X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_CPU_BUF ( 3*32+18) /* "" Clear CPU buffers using VERW */
> #define X86_FEATURE_ACC_POWER ( 3*32+19) /* AMD Accumulated Power Mechanism */
> #define X86_FEATURE_NOPL ( 3*32+20) /* The NOPL (0F 1F) instructions */
> @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@
> #define X86_FEATURE_SSBD ( 7*32+17) /* Speculative Store Bypass Disable */
> #define X86_FEATURE_MBA ( 7*32+18) /* Memory Bandwidth Allocation */
> #define X86_FEATURE_RSB_CTXSW ( 7*32+19) /* "" Fill RSB on context switches */
> -#define X86_FEATURE_PERFMON_V2 ( 7*32+20) /* AMD Performance Monitoring Version 2 */
> +/* FREE! ( 7*32+20) */
> #define X86_FEATURE_USE_IBPB ( 7*32+21) /* "" Indirect Branch Prediction Barrier enabled */
> #define X86_FEATURE_USE_IBRS_FW ( 7*32+22) /* "" Use IBRS during runtime firmware calls */
> #define X86_FEATURE_SPEC_STORE_BYPASS_DISABLE ( 7*32+23) /* "" Disable Speculative Store Bypass. */
> @@ -459,6 +459,10 @@
> #define X86_FEATURE_IBPB_BRTYPE (20*32+28) /* "" MSR_PRED_CMD[IBPB] flushes all branch type predictions */
> #define X86_FEATURE_SRSO_NO (20*32+29) /* "" CPU is not affected by SRSO */
>
> +/* AMD-defined performance monitoring features, CPUID level 0x80000022 (EAX), word 21 */
> +#define X86_FEATURE_PERFMON_V2 (21*32+ 0) /* AMD Performance Monitoring Version 2 */
> +#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_LBR_V2 (21*32+ 1) /* AMD Last Branch Record Extension Version 2 */
Thank you! I presume you tested both patches on the relevant system
with the X86_FEATURE_AMD_LBR_PMC_FREEZE bug?
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists