[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d096d9ea-39db-4a15-9c4d-ae228db970cb@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:25:59 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Josua Mayer <josua@...id-run.com>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Johannes Berg
<johannes@...solutions.net>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: net: rfkill-gpio: add reset-gpio property
On 19/03/2024 11:13, Josua Mayer wrote:
> rfkill-gpio driver supports management of two gpios: reset, shutdown.
> Reset seems to have been missed when bindings were added.
No, you do not add properties just because driver supports them.
Bindings are for hardware, not for drivers.
You now revert all the comments from v1, without actually addressing them.
NAK. Or provide rationale why my previous comments, from adding the
binding, should be reversed/ignored/overruled.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists