| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20240320023446.882006-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 10:34:46 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Andrew Theurer <atheurer@...hat.com>,
Joe Mario <jmario@...hat.com>,
Sebastian Jug <sejug@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH V4] blk-mq: don't schedule block kworker on isolated CPUs
Kernel parameter of `isolcpus=` or 'nohz_full=' are used to isolate CPUs
for specific task, and it isn't expected to let block IO disturb these CPUs.
blk-mq kworker shouldn't be scheduled on isolated CPUs. Also if isolated
CPUs is run for blk-mq kworker, long block IO latency can be caused.
Kernel workqueue only respects CPU isolation for WQ_UNBOUND, for bound
WQ, the responsibility is on user because CPU is specified as WQ API
parameter, such as mod_delayed_work_on(cpu), queue_delayed_work_on(cpu)
and queue_work_on(cpu).
So not run blk-mq kworker on isolated CPUs by removing isolated CPUs
from hctx->cpumask. Meantime use queue map to check if all CPUs in this
hw queue are offline instead of hctx->cpumask, this way can avoid any
cost in fast IO code path, and is safe since hctx->cpumask are only
used in the two cases.
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Theurer <atheurer@...hat.com>
Cc: Joe Mario <jmario@...hat.com>
Cc: Sebastian Jug <sejug@...hat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Tested-by: Joe Mario <jmario@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
---
V4:
- improve comment & commit log as suggested by Tim
V3:
- avoid to check invalid cpu as reported by Bart
- take current cpu(to be offline, not done yet) into account
- simplify blk_mq_hctx_has_online_cpu()
V2:
- remove module parameter, meantime use queue map to check if
all cpus in one hctx are offline
block/blk-mq.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 555ada922cf0..187fbfacb397 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
#include <linux/prefetch.h>
#include <linux/blk-crypto.h>
#include <linux/part_stat.h>
+#include <linux/sched/isolation.h>
#include <trace/events/block.h>
@@ -2179,7 +2180,11 @@ static int blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
bool tried = false;
int next_cpu = hctx->next_cpu;
- if (hctx->queue->nr_hw_queues == 1)
+ /*
+ * Switch to unbound work if all CPUs in this hw queue fall
+ * into isolated CPUs
+ */
+ if (hctx->queue->nr_hw_queues == 1 || next_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
return WORK_CPU_UNBOUND;
if (--hctx->next_cpu_batch <= 0) {
@@ -3488,14 +3493,30 @@ static bool blk_mq_hctx_has_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
return data.has_rq;
}
-static inline bool blk_mq_last_cpu_in_hctx(unsigned int cpu,
- struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
+static bool blk_mq_hctx_has_online_cpu(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
+ unsigned int this_cpu)
{
- if (cpumask_first_and(hctx->cpumask, cpu_online_mask) != cpu)
- return false;
- if (cpumask_next_and(cpu, hctx->cpumask, cpu_online_mask) < nr_cpu_ids)
- return false;
- return true;
+ enum hctx_type type = hctx->type;
+ int cpu;
+
+ /*
+ * hctx->cpumask has rule out isolated CPUs, but userspace still
+ * might submit IOs on these isolated CPUs, so use queue map to
+ * check if all CPUs mapped to this hctx are offline
+ */
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+ struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *h = blk_mq_map_queue_type(hctx->queue,
+ type, cpu);
+
+ if (h != hctx)
+ continue;
+
+ /* this hctx has at least one online CPU */
+ if (this_cpu != cpu)
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return false;
}
static int blk_mq_hctx_notify_offline(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
@@ -3503,8 +3524,7 @@ static int blk_mq_hctx_notify_offline(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = hlist_entry_safe(node,
struct blk_mq_hw_ctx, cpuhp_online);
- if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, hctx->cpumask) ||
- !blk_mq_last_cpu_in_hctx(cpu, hctx))
+ if (blk_mq_hctx_has_online_cpu(hctx, cpu))
return 0;
/*
@@ -3912,6 +3932,8 @@ static void blk_mq_map_swqueue(struct request_queue *q)
}
queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
+ int cpu;
+
/*
* If no software queues are mapped to this hardware queue,
* disable it and free the request entries.
@@ -3938,6 +3960,15 @@ static void blk_mq_map_swqueue(struct request_queue *q)
*/
sbitmap_resize(&hctx->ctx_map, hctx->nr_ctx);
+ /*
+ * Rule out isolated CPUs from hctx->cpumask to avoid
+ * running run wq worker on isolated CPU
+ */
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, hctx->cpumask) {
+ if (cpu_is_isolated(cpu))
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, hctx->cpumask);
+ }
+
/*
* Initialize batch roundrobin counts
*/
--
2.41.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists