[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240320005024.3216282-2-seanjc@google.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 17:50:21 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
David Stevens <stevensd@...omium.org>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Skip the "try unsync" path iff the old
SPTE was a leaf SPTE
Apply make_spte()'s optimization to skip trying to unsync shadow pages if
and only if the old SPTE was a leaf SPTE, as non-leaf SPTEs in direct MMUs
are always writable, i.e. could trigger a false positive and incorrectly
lead to KVM creating a SPTE without write-protecting or marking shadow
pages unsync.
This bug only affects the TDP MMU, as the shadow MMU only overwrites a
shadow-present SPTE when synchronizing SPTEs (and only 4KiB SPTEs can be
unsync). Specifically, mmu_set_spte() drops any non-leaf SPTEs *before*
calling make_spte(), whereas the TDP MMU can do a direct replacement of a
page table with the leaf SPTE.
Opportunistically update the comment to explain why skipping the unsync
stuff is safe, as opposed to simply saying "it's someone else's problem".
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
index 4a599130e9c9..b4c1119cc48b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
@@ -206,12 +206,20 @@ bool make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
spte |= PT_WRITABLE_MASK | shadow_mmu_writable_mask;
/*
- * Optimization: for pte sync, if spte was writable the hash
- * lookup is unnecessary (and expensive). Write protection
- * is responsibility of kvm_mmu_get_page / kvm_mmu_sync_roots.
- * Same reasoning can be applied to dirty page accounting.
+ * When overwriting an existing leaf SPTE, and the old SPTE was
+ * writable, skip trying to unsync shadow pages as any relevant
+ * shadow pages must already be unsync, i.e. the hash lookup is
+ * unnecessary (and expensive).
+ *
+ * The same reasoning applies to dirty page/folio accounting;
+ * KVM will mark the folio dirty using the old SPTE, thus
+ * there's no need to immediately mark the new SPTE as dirty.
+ *
+ * Note, both cases rely on KVM not changing PFNs without first
+ * zapping the old SPTE, which is guaranteed by both the shadow
+ * MMU and the TDP MMU.
*/
- if (is_writable_pte(old_spte))
+ if (is_last_spte(old_spte, level) && is_writable_pte(old_spte))
goto out;
/*
--
2.44.0.291.gc1ea87d7ee-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists