| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 11:18:04 +0200 From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org> To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> Cc: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] wifi: nl80211: fix nl80211 UAPI kernel-doc Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> writes: > On Tue, 2024-03-19 at 11:26 -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote: >> As part of my review of patches coming from the Qualcomm Innovation >> Center I check to make sure that no checkpatch or kernel-doc issues >> are introduced. An upcoming patch will propose a modification to >> include/uapi/linux/nl80211.h. My review process flagged both >> checkpatch and kernel-doc issues in the file, but these are >> pre-existing issues. So this series fixes those pre-existing issues. >> > > Thanks Jeff. > > Can you say what you're running for this? I've been running kernel-doc > and builds with W=1 for a long time, and not seen issues. Is this > perhaps checks from a newer kernel (we're currently on 6.8-rc1 for > $reasons)? FWIW I also check for kernel-doc warnings every time I push to wireless or wireless-next and I don't see anything, so it's not kernel version related. I think I'll add the Jeff's tests to my scripts, once he provides them, so that we can catch these early. Of course it would be even better to have patchwork tests for stuff like this. Here's hoping we eventually implement those :) -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists