[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZfrBsY1rF-5stHqU@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 13:00:01 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@...il.com>
Cc: jic23@...nel.org, lars@...afoo.de, ang.iglesiasg@...il.com,
mazziesaccount@...il.com, ak@...klinger.de,
petre.rodan@...dimension.ro, phil@...pberrypi.com, 579lpy@...il.com,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, semen.protsenko@...aro.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] iio: pressure: Introduce new cleanup routines to
BMP280 driver *_raw() functions
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 01:29:21AM +0100, Vasileios Amoiridis wrote:
> Introduce the new linux/cleanup.h with the guard(mutex) functionality
> in the {read/write}_raw() functions
Missing period at the end of the sentence.
..
> switch (mask) {
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED:
> switch (chan->type) {
> case IIO_HUMIDITYRELATIVE:
> - ret = data->chip_info->read_humid(data, val, val2);
> - break;
> + return data->chip_info->read_humid(data, val, val2);
> case IIO_PRESSURE:
> - ret = data->chip_info->read_press(data, val, val2);
> - break;
> + return data->chip_info->read_press(data, val, val2);
> case IIO_TEMP:
> - ret = data->chip_info->read_temp(data, val, val2);
> - break;
> + return data->chip_info->read_temp(data, val, val2);
> default:
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - break;
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
> - break;
> + return 0;
Now dead code.
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_OVERSAMPLING_RATIO:
> switch (chan->type) {
> case IIO_HUMIDITYRELATIVE:
> *val = 1 << data->oversampling_humid;
> - ret = IIO_VAL_INT;
> - break;
> + return IIO_VAL_INT;
> case IIO_PRESSURE:
> *val = 1 << data->oversampling_press;
> - ret = IIO_VAL_INT;
> - break;
> + return IIO_VAL_INT;
> case IIO_TEMP:
> *val = 1 << data->oversampling_temp;
> - ret = IIO_VAL_INT;
> - break;
> + return IIO_VAL_INT;
> default:
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - break;
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
> - break;
> + return 0;
Ditto.
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
> if (!data->chip_info->sampling_freq_avail) {
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - break;
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> *val = data->chip_info->sampling_freq_avail[data->sampling_freq][0];
> *val2 = data->chip_info->sampling_freq_avail[data->sampling_freq][1];
> - ret = IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
> - break;
> + return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_LOW_PASS_FILTER_3DB_FREQUENCY:
> if (!data->chip_info->iir_filter_coeffs_avail) {
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - break;
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> *val = (1 << data->iir_filter_coeff) - 1;
> - ret = IIO_VAL_INT;
> - break;
> + return IIO_VAL_INT;
> default:
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - break;
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
> - mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
> + return 0;
Ditto.
..
> +
> +
One blank line is enough.
> +static int bmp280_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> + struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
> + int *val, int *val2, long mask)
..
> switch (mask) {
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_OVERSAMPLING_RATIO:
> - pm_runtime_get_sync(data->dev);
> - mutex_lock(&data->lock);
> switch (chan->type) {
> case IIO_HUMIDITYRELATIVE:
> - ret = bmp280_write_oversampling_ratio_humid(data, val);
> - break;
> + return bmp280_write_oversampling_ratio_humid(data, val);
> case IIO_PRESSURE:
> - ret = bmp280_write_oversampling_ratio_press(data, val);
> - break;
> + return bmp280_write_oversampling_ratio_press(data, val);
> case IIO_TEMP:
> - ret = bmp280_write_oversampling_ratio_temp(data, val);
> - break;
> + return bmp280_write_oversampling_ratio_temp(data, val);
> default:
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - break;
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
> - mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
> - pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(data->dev);
> - pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(data->dev);
> - break;
> + return 0;
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
> - pm_runtime_get_sync(data->dev);
> - mutex_lock(&data->lock);
> - ret = bmp280_write_sampling_frequency(data, val, val2);
> - mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
> - pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(data->dev);
> - pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(data->dev);
> - break;
> + return bmp280_write_sampling_frequency(data, val, val2);
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_LOW_PASS_FILTER_3DB_FREQUENCY:
> - pm_runtime_get_sync(data->dev);
> - mutex_lock(&data->lock);
> - ret = bmp280_write_iir_filter_coeffs(data, val);
> - mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
> - pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(data->dev);
> - pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(data->dev);
> - break;
> + return bmp280_write_iir_filter_coeffs(data, val);
> default:
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + return 0;
As per above, dead code.
..
> +static int bmp280_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> + struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
> + int val, int val2, long mask)
> +{
> + struct bmp280_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + int ret = 0;
Useless assignment.
> +
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(data->dev);
> + ret = bmp280_write_raw_guarded(indio_dev, chan, val, val2, mask);
> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(data->dev);
> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(data->dev);
> +
> return ret;
> }
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists