[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWP4R6Y6G0qzhMKJy1zJEeHE8a0XEK+Hs_D4wXB2i2BFA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 15:28:37 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>,
Hal Feng <hal.feng@...rfivetech.com>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] clk: starfive: jh7100: Use clk_hw for external input clocks
Hi Samuel,
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 2:31 PM Samuel Holland
<samuel.holland@...ive.com> wrote:
> On 2024-03-20 6:24 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > The Starfive JH7100 clock driver does not use the DT "clocks" property
> > to find the external main input clock, but instead relies on the name of
> > the actual clock provider ("osc_sys"). This is fragile, and caused
> > breakage when sanitizing clock node names in DTS.
> >
> > Fix this by obtaining the external main input clock using
> > devm_clk_get(), and passing the returned clk_hw object to
> > devm_clk_hw_register_fixed_factor_parent_hw().
> >
> > While name-based look-up of the other external input clocks works as-is,
> > convert them to a similar clk_hw-based scheme to increase uniformity,
> > and to decrease the number of name-based look-ups.
> >
> > Fixes: f03606470886 ("riscv: dts: starfive: replace underscores in node names")
> > Fixes: 4210be668a09ee20 ("clk: starfive: Add JH7100 clock generator driver")
> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> > --- a/drivers/clk/starfive/clk-starfive-jh7100.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/starfive/clk-starfive-jh7100.c
> > @@ -284,8 +293,11 @@ static struct clk_hw *jh7100_clk_get(struct of_phandle_args *clkspec, void *data
> >
> > static int __init clk_starfive_jh7100_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > + static const char *jh7100_ext_clk[EXT_NUM_CLKS] =
> > + { "osc_sys", "osc_aud", "gmac_rmii_ref", "gmac_gr_mii_rxclk" };
>
> This should be __initconst. Otherwise:
With
- static const char *jh7100_ext_clk[EXT_NUM_CLKS] =
+ static const char *jh7100_ext_clk[EXT_NUM_CLKS] __initconst =
I get:
drivers/clk/starfive/clk-starfive-jh7100.c: In function
‘clk_starfive_jh7100_probe’:
drivers/clk/starfive/clk-starfive-jh7100.c:35:37: error:
‘jh7100_clk_data’ causes a section type conflict with ‘jh7100_ext_clk’
35 | static const struct jh71x0_clk_data jh7100_clk_data[]
__initconst = {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/starfive/clk-starfive-jh7100.c:296:28: note:
‘jh7100_ext_clk’ was declared here
296 | static const char *jh7100_ext_clk[EXT_NUM_CLKS]
__initconst =
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
which is a bit strange...
What am I missing?
> Reviewed-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68korg
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists