[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <24792e21-afcf-489f-a47b-01f88721ea5a@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 17:14:23 +0200
From: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...il.com>
To: Bastien Curutchet <bastien.curutchet@...tlin.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>
Cc: linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, herve.codina@...tlin.com,
christophercordahi@...ometrics.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] ASoC: ti: davinci-i2s: Add TDM support
HI Bastien,
On 20/03/2024 09:31, Bastien Curutchet wrote:
>>> + if ((dev->tdm_slots || dev->slot_width) &&
>>> + ((fmt & SND_SOC_DAIFMT_CLOCK_PROVIDER_MASK) !=
>>> SND_SOC_DAIFMT_BP_FC)) {
>>> + dev_err(dev->dev, "TDM is only supported for BP_FC format\n");
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>
>> I think this is not a valid statement, Fsync can be generated internally
>> or coming from external source in TDM mode also.
>>
>
> My hardware allow me to only test BP_FC so I wished to put some
> 'barriers' in front of untested things.
I don't see restrictions on the other changes affecting this to be lifted.
I would allow TDM for full clock provider mode also.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Bastien
--
Péter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists