[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6ddf112f-29d7-42b6-8d80-b8ed8fd987ba@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 10:10:37 -0700
From: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva"
<gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] wireless: ti: Can we just remove this flexible array?
On 3/20/2024 2:03 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-03-19 at 18:42 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>>
>>>> - /* payload */
>>>> - u8 data[];
>>>> } __packed;
>>>
>
> Why not keep (or even add in the cases where it's not) the comment
> though?
For something called <foo>_header isn't it implicit that something will
probably follow?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists