[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240320172240.7buswiv7zj2m5odg@quack3>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 18:22:40 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tj@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
willy@...radead.org, bfoster@...hat.com, jack@...e.cz,
dsterba@...e.com, mjguzik@...il.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Improve visibility of writeback
On Wed 20-03-24 19:02:16, Kemeng Shi wrote:
> This series tries to improve visilibity of writeback. Patch 1 make
> /sys/kernel/debug/bdi/xxx/stats show writeback info of whole bdi
> instead of only writeback info in root cgroup. Patch 2 add a new
> debug file /sys/kernel/debug/bdi/xxx/wb_stats to show per wb writeback
> info. Patch 4 add wb_monitor.py to monitor basic writeback info
> of running system, more info could be added on demand. Rest patches
> are some random cleanups. More details can be found in respective
> patches. Thanks!
>
> Following domain hierarchy is tested:
> global domain (320G)
> / \
> cgroup domain1(10G) cgroup domain2(10G)
> | |
> bdi wb1 wb2
>
> /* all writeback info of bdi is successfully collected */
> # cat /sys/kernel/debug/bdi/252:16/stats:
> BdiWriteback: 448 kB
> BdiReclaimable: 1303904 kB
> BdiDirtyThresh: 189914124 kB
> DirtyThresh: 195337564 kB
> BackgroundThresh: 32516508 kB
> BdiDirtied: 3591392 kB
> BdiWritten: 2287488 kB
> BdiWriteBandwidth: 322248 kBps
> b_dirty: 0
> b_io: 0
> b_more_io: 2
> b_dirty_time: 0
> bdi_list: 1
> state: 1
>
> /* per wb writeback info is collected */
> # cat /sys/kernel/debug/bdi/252:16/wb_stats:
> cat wb_stats
> WbCgIno: 1
> WbWriteback: 0 kB
> WbReclaimable: 0 kB
> WbDirtyThresh: 0 kB
> WbDirtied: 0 kB
> WbWritten: 0 kB
> WbWriteBandwidth: 102400 kBps
> b_dirty: 0
> b_io: 0
> b_more_io: 0
> b_dirty_time: 0
> state: 1
> WbCgIno: 4284
> WbWriteback: 448 kB
> WbReclaimable: 818944 kB
> WbDirtyThresh: 3096524 kB
> WbDirtied: 2266880 kB
> WbWritten: 1447936 kB
> WbWriteBandwidth: 214036 kBps
> b_dirty: 0
> b_io: 0
> b_more_io: 1
> b_dirty_time: 0
> state: 5
> WbCgIno: 4325
> WbWriteback: 224 kB
> WbReclaimable: 819392 kB
> WbDirtyThresh: 2920088 kB
> WbDirtied: 2551808 kB
> WbWritten: 1732416 kB
> WbWriteBandwidth: 201832 kBps
> b_dirty: 0
> b_io: 0
> b_more_io: 1
> b_dirty_time: 0
> state: 5
>
> /* monitor writeback info */
> # ./wb_monitor.py 252:16 -c
> writeback reclaimable dirtied written avg_bw
> 252:16_1 0 0 0 0 102400
> 252:16_4284 672 820064 9230368 8410304 685612
> 252:16_4325 896 819840 10491264 9671648 652348
> 252:16 1568 1639904 19721632 18081952 1440360
>
>
> writeback reclaimable dirtied written avg_bw
> 252:16_1 0 0 0 0 102400
> 252:16_4284 672 820064 9230368 8410304 685612
> 252:16_4325 896 819840 10491264 9671648 652348
> 252:16 1568 1639904 19721632 18081952 1440360
> ...
So I'm wondering: Are you implementing this just because this looks
interesting or do you have a real need for the functionality? Why?
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists