linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/5] mfd: add driver for Marvell 88PM886 PMIC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e9c7bd38-49cd-44c2-8842-292bc0b4205f@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 17:48:28 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Karel Balej <balejk@...fyz.cz>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
	Duje Mihanović <duje.mihanovic@...le.hr>,
	~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/5] mfd: add driver for Marvell 88PM886 PMIC

On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 06:32:03PM +0100, Karel Balej wrote:
> Mark Brown, 2024-03-21T17:17:40+00:00:

> > Do they both genuinely have the same maximum register?

> They do according to the downstream driver which is my only reference.
> In fact, there the driver defines the configs separately for each regmap
> but with the same values.

This is a downstream driver - are you sure it's got the best code
quality?  I'm not seeing any references to registers with numbers as
high as the maximum register that's there in your driver for example.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)