[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240321151353.68f9a3c9c0b261887e4e5411@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:13:53 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, Christian Borntraeger
<borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>, Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>, Claudio
Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Alexander
Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>, Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>, Andrea Arcangeli
<aarcange@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] s390/mm: shared zeropage + KVM fix and
optimization
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 22:59:52 +0100 David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
> Based on current mm-unstable. Maybe at least the second patch should
> go via the s390x tree, I think patch #1 could go that route as well.
Taking both via the s390 tree is OK by me. I'll drop the mm.git copies
if/when these turn up in the linux-next feed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists