linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] s390/mm: shared zeropage + KVM fix and optimization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:13:53 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, Christian Borntraeger
 <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>, Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>, Claudio
 Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
 Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Alexander
 Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>, Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
 Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>, Andrea Arcangeli
 <aarcange@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] s390/mm: shared zeropage + KVM fix and
 optimization

On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 22:59:52 +0100 David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:

> Based on current mm-unstable. Maybe at least the second patch should
> go via the s390x tree, I think patch #1 could go that route as well.

Taking both via the s390 tree is OK by me.  I'll drop the mm.git copies
if/when these turn up in the linux-next feed.