[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZfzAZJmrBwVi5e28@x1>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 20:19:00 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the perf tree
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 08:18:03PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 08:41:31AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the perf tree, today's linux-next build (native perf)
> > failed like this:
> >
> > make[3]: *** No rule to make target '/home/sfr/next/next/tools/include/uapi/linux/stat.h', needed by '/home/sfr/next/perf/libbpf/staticobjs/libbpf.o'. Stop.
About this specific problem, was this done on over a previous build? Can
you try after a 'make -C tools/perf clean' ?
> > Caused by commit
> >
> > f122b3d6d179 ("perf beauty: Introduce scrape script for the 'statx' syscall 'mask' argument")
> > Are all these new commits today really destined for the current merge
> > window?
> >
> > I have used the perf tree from next-20240321 for today.
>
> Ok, maybe I opened perf-tools-next for the next merge window too early?
>
> For this merge window I think Namhyung is switching to perf-tools,
> right?
>
> From your reaction I think I made a mistake and should have opened
> perf-tools-next for v6.10 stuff only when the v6.9-rc1 gets released...
>
> - Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists