[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <90f0c8e5-01ec-4cb9-88a0-fe36d8d20443@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 08:37:15 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>, Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: display: samsung,exynos5-dp: convert to
DT Schema
On 20/03/2024 18:04, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 07:28:55PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
>> + clock-names:
>> + items:
>> + - const: dp
>
>> + phy-names:
>> + items:
>> + - const: dp
>
> The items lists here are redundant when you only have a single item, no?
> Isnt it just
> phy-names:
> const: dp
Somehow the convention for properties was to define the list. Unlike for
compatible where we use shorter syntax like you propose. Shall we change
the approach and use shorter syntax in general?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists