[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ec90ffc0-fb26-462a-b470-4368c2f7dc68@web.de>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 10:22:00 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@....com>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, git@....com,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>, Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: ahci_ceva: return of_property_read_u8_array() error
code
> In the ahci_ceva_probe() error path instead of returning -EINVAL for all
> of_property_read_u8_array() failure types return the actual error code.
> It removes the redundant -EINVAL assignment at multiple places and
> improves the error handling path.
A) Would a change description be more desirable with a corresponding imperative wording?
See also:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.8#n94
B) Can it be helpful to specify the hint “in ceva_ahci_probe()” at the end
of the patch subject?
C) How do you think about to extend the application of scope-based resource management here?
See also:
Article by Jonathan Corbet
2023-06-15
https://lwn.net/Articles/934679/
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists