linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/8] iommu: Introduce a replace API for device pasid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:20:59 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
Cc: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
	"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
	"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
	"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
	"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
	"cohuck@...hat.com" <cohuck@...hat.com>,
	"eric.auger@...hat.com" <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
	"nicolinc@...dia.com" <nicolinc@...dia.com>,
	"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com" <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
	"chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com" <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>,
	"yi.y.sun@...ux.intel.com" <yi.y.sun@...ux.intel.com>,
	"peterx@...hat.com" <peterx@...hat.com>,
	"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
	"shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com" <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
	"lulu@...hat.com" <lulu@...hat.com>,
	"suravee.suthikulpanit@....com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
	"iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Duan, Zhenzhong" <zhenzhong.duan@...el.com>,
	"joao.m.martins@...cle.com" <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>,
	"Zeng, Xin" <xin.zeng@...el.com>,
	"Zhao, Yan Y" <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] iommu: Introduce a replace API for device pasid

On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 07:26:41PM +0800, Yi Liu wrote:
> > yes, the correct way is to undo what have been done before the fail
> > device. However, I somehow remember that pasid capability is only
> > available when the group is singleton. So iterate all devices of the
> > devices just means one device in fact. If this is true, then the
> > current code is fine although a bit confusing.

Platform devicse don't have that limitation.. It is PCI only.

> > > And the whole thing is easier to reason about if an input argument
> > > specifies the current attached domain instead of having the driver
> > > read it from the xarray.
> > 
> > yep, will correct it as a fix patch.
> 
> Hi Jason,
> 
> It appears there are two solutions here.
> 
> First, only undo the devices that have set_dev_pasid successfully in
> the __iommu_set_group_pasid(), so the problematic
> __iommu_remove_group_pasid() call at line 3378 [1] would go away.
> This also makes the helper more self-contained. Draft patch in [2]
> 
> Second, pass in the domain to remove_dev_pasid(). Draft patch in [3]
> 
> Either of the above two should be able to solve the mistake you mentioned.
> BTW. They are orthogonal, so it's also possible to apply both of them.
> Which one is your preference then?

I would do both because I also think it is not nice that the drivers
always have to have the boiler plate to read the xarray in their
remove..

Jason