linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net v2] net: ll_temac: platform_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7b3a5167319156e96b7f754d23de455f3a80079a.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:51:06 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Claus Hansen Ries <chr@...ma.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
	 <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "edumazet@...gle.com"
 <edumazet@...gle.com>, "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>, 
 "michal.simek@....com" <michal.simek@....com>, "wei.fang@....com"
 <wei.fang@....com>,  "yangyingliang@...wei.com" <yangyingliang@...wei.com>,
 "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,  "harini.katakam@....com"
 <harini.katakam@....com>, "dan.carpenter@...aro.org"
 <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,  "u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de"
 <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, "wanghai38@...wei.com"
 <wanghai38@...wei.com>,  "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
 <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net: ll_temac: platform_get_resource replaced by
 wrong function

On Wed, 2024-03-20 at 14:19 +0000, Claus Hansen Ries wrote:
> From: Claus Hansen Ries <chr@...ma.com>
> 
> Hope I am resubmitting this correctly, I've fixed the issues in 
> the original submission.

Sorry for nit picking, but please re-submit dropping the above line,
you probably don't want them in git history, too.

In the next submission you can retain the already collected RB tag.

Additionally it looks like the From matches the sender email address:
it's not needed (but it does not hurt not will produce any differences
in git history).

Cheers,

Paolo