[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240321152143.yxoonjy3m6bdddkf@joelS2.panther.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 16:21:43 +0100
From: Joel Granados <j.granados@...sung.com>
To: <wenyang.linux@...mail.com>
CC: "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, Luis Chamberlain
<mcgrof@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Christian Brauner
<brauner@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] encode the values directly in the table entry
On Sat, Mar 09, 2024 at 06:31:17PM +0800, wenyang.linux@...mail.com wrote:
> From: Wen Yang <wenyang.linux@...mail.com>
>
> The boundary check of multiple modules uses these static variables (such as
> two_five_five, n_65535, ue_int_max, etc), and they are also not changed.
This message is a bit cryptic. I had to do a fair amount of research to
get what you meant here. Having the context in front is OK with me, but
I would add a bit more information so the reader does not have to go to
the code and grep for the variables that you mean. Something like this:
"When using a sysctl proc_handler that requires a boundary check (like
proce_dointvec_minmax) it is common to use a const variable like n_65535
in net/rxrpc/sysctl.c or OTHER EXAMPLES...). This is suboptimal because
YOUR REASONS HERE"
>
> Eric points out: "by turning .extra1 and .extra2 into longs instead of
> keeping them as pointers and needing constants to be pointed at somewhere
> ... The only people I can see who find a significant benefit by
> consolidating all of the constants into one place are people who know how
> to stomp kernel memory."
I think it would be better to just link to the lore discussion.
>
> This patch series achieves direct encoding values in table entries and still
> maintains compatibility with existing extra1/extra2 pointers.
> Afterwards, we can remove these unnecessary static variables progressively and
> also gradually kill the shared const array.
Two things:
1. Please name the const array: sysctl_vals
2. What is missing from this patchset to completely kill sysctl_vals?
>
> Wen Yang (9):
> sysctl: support encoding values directly in the table entry
> kernel/sysctl-test: add some kunit test cases for min/max detection
> rxrpc: delete these unnecessary static variables n_65535, four,
> max_500, etc
> net: ipv6: delete these unnecessary static variables two_five_five and
> minus_one
> svcrdma: delete these unnecessary static variables min_ord, max_ord,
> etc
> sysctl: delete these unnecessary static variables i_zero and
> i_one_hundred
> epoll: delete these unnecessary static variables long_zero and
> long_max
> fs: inotify: delete these unnecessary static variables it_zero and
> it_int_max
> ucounts: delete these unnecessary static variables ue_zero and
> ue_int_max
>
> fs/eventpoll.c | 19 +-
> fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c | 49 +++--
> include/linux/sysctl.h | 108 ++++++++++-
> kernel/sysctl-test.c | 300 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/sysctl.c | 61 +++++--
> kernel/ucount.c | 8 +-
> lib/test_sysctl.c | 12 +-
> net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 15 +-
> net/rxrpc/sysctl.c | 169 ++++++++---------
> net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma.c | 21 +--
> 10 files changed, 571 insertions(+), 191 deletions(-)
>
> Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Cc: Joel Granados <j.granados@...sung.com>
> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
--
Joel Granados
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (660 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists