[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240321114636.5ed19630@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:46:36 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>, <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
<linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/5] tracing/probes: support '%pd' type for print
struct dentry's name
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 00:07:59 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> > What would be really useful is if we had a way to expose BTF here. Something like:
> >
> > "%pB:<struct>:<field>"
> >
> > The "%pB" would mean to look up the struct/field offsets and types via BTF,
> > and create the appropriate command to find and print it.
>
> Would you mean casing the pointer to "<struct>"?
I mean, instead of having:
":%pd"
We could have:
"+0(*:%pB:dentry:name):string"
Where the parsing could use BTF to see that this is a pointer to "struct dentry"
and the member field is "name".
This would also allow pretty much any other structure dereference.
That is if BTF gives structure member offsets?
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists