linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 1/5] tracing/probes: support '%pd' type for print struct dentry's name

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:46:36 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>, <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
 <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/5] tracing/probes: support '%pd' type for print
 struct dentry's name

On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 00:07:59 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:

> > What would be really useful is if we had a way to expose BTF here. Something like:
> > 
> >  "%pB:<struct>:<field>"
> > 
> > The "%pB" would mean to look up the struct/field offsets and types via BTF,
> > and create the appropriate command to find and print it.  
> 
> Would you mean casing the pointer to "<struct>"?

I mean, instead of having:

 ":%pd"

We could have:

 "+0(*:%pB:dentry:name):string"

Where the parsing could use BTF to see that this is a pointer to "struct dentry"
and the member field is "name".

This would also allow pretty much any other structure dereference.
That is if BTF gives structure member offsets?

-- Steve