[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <CZZK759UU6G7.MFPYOI0HBB6I@matfyz.cz>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 17:12:52 +0100
From: "Karel Balej" <balejk@...fyz.cz>
To: "Lee Jones" <lee@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
"Liam Girdwood"
<lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@...nel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
Duje Mihanović
<duje.mihanovic@...le.hr>,
<~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht>, <phone-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/5] mfd: add driver for Marvell 88PM886 PMIC
Lee Jones, 2024-03-21T15:42:11+00:00:
> On Mon, 11 Mar 2024, Karel Balej wrote:
>
> > From: Karel Balej <balejk@...fyz.cz>
> >
> > Marvell 88PM886 is a PMIC which provides various functions such as
> > onkey, battery, charger and regulators. It is found for instance in the
> > samsung,coreprimevelte smartphone with which this was tested. Implement
> > basic support to allow for the use of regulators and onkey.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Karel Balej <balejk@...fyz.cz>
> > ---
> >
> > Notes:
> > RFC v4:
> > - Use MFD_CELL_* macros.
> > - Address Lee's feedback:
> > - Do not define regmap_config.val_bits and .reg_bits.
> > - Drop everything regulator related except mfd_cell (regmap
> > initialization, IDs enum etc.). Drop pm886_initialize_subregmaps.
> > - Do not store regmap pointers as an array as there is now only one
> > regmap. Also drop the corresponding enum.
> > - Move regmap_config to the header as it is needed in the regulators
> > driver.
> > - pm886_chip.whoami -> chip_id
> > - Reword chip ID mismatch error message and print the ID as
> > hexadecimal.
> > - Fix includes in include/linux/88pm886.h.
> > - Drop the pm886_irq_number enum and define the (for the moment) only
> > IRQ explicitly.
> > - Have only one MFD cell for all regulators as they are now registered
> > all at once in the regulators driver.
> > - Reword commit message.
> > - Make device table static and remove comma after the sentinel to signal
> > that nothing should come after it.
> > RFC v3:
> > - Drop onkey cell .of_compatible.
> > - Rename LDO page offset and regmap to REGULATORS.
> > RFC v2:
> > - Remove some abstraction.
> > - Sort includes alphabetically and add linux/of.h.
> > - Depend on OF, remove of_match_ptr and add MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE.
> > - Use more temporaries and break long lines.
> > - Do not initialize ret in probe.
> > - Use the wakeup-source DT property.
> > - Rename ret to err.
> > - Address Lee's comments:
> > - Drop patched in presets for base regmap and related defines.
> > - Use full sentences in comments.
> > - Remove IRQ comment.
> > - Define regmap_config member values.
> > - Rename data to sys_off_data.
> > - Add _PMIC suffix to Kconfig.
> > - Use dev_err_probe.
> > - Do not store irq_data.
> > - s/WHOAMI/CHIP_ID
> > - Drop LINUX part of include guard name.
> > - Merge in the regulator series modifications in order to have more
> > devices and modify the commit message accordingly. Changes with
> > respect to the original regulator series patches:
> > - ret -> err
> > - Add temporary for dev in pm88x_initialize_subregmaps.
> > - Drop of_compatible for the regulators.
> > - Do not duplicate LDO regmap for bucks.
> > - Rewrite commit message.
> >
> > drivers/mfd/88pm886.c | 149 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 12 +++
> > drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 +
> > include/linux/mfd/88pm886.h | 38 +++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 200 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/88pm886.c
> > create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/88pm886.h
>
> Looks mostly okay.
>
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/88pm886.h b/include/linux/mfd/88pm886.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..a5e6524bb19d
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/linux/mfd/88pm886.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> > +#ifndef __MFD_88PM886_H
> > +#define __MFD_88PM886_H
> > +
> > +#include <linux/i2c.h>
> > +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> > +
> > +#define PM886_A1_CHIP_ID 0xa1
> > +
> > +#define PM886_REGMAP_CONF_MAX_REG 0xfe
> > +
> > +#define PM886_REG_ID 0x00
> > +
> > +#define PM886_REG_STATUS1 0x01
> > +#define PM886_ONKEY_STS1 BIT(0)
> > +
> > +#define PM886_REG_MISC_CONFIG1 0x14
> > +#define PM886_SW_PDOWN BIT(5)
> > +
> > +#define PM886_REG_MISC_CONFIG2 0x15
> > +#define PM886_INT_INV BIT(0)
> > +#define PM886_INT_CLEAR BIT(1)
> > +#define PM886_INT_RC 0x00
> > +#define PM886_INT_WC BIT(1)
> > +#define PM886_INT_MASK_MODE BIT(2)
> > +
> > +struct pm886_chip {
> > + struct i2c_client *client;
> > + unsigned int chip_id;
> > + struct regmap *regmap;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct regmap_config pm886_i2c_regmap = {
> > + .reg_bits = 8,
> > + .val_bits = 8,
> > + .max_register = PM886_REGMAP_CONF_MAX_REG,
> > +};
>
> Why is this in here?
Because since I moved the regulators regmap initialization into the
regulators driver, I need to access it from there.
> What would you like me to do with this RFC patch?
I was hoping that you would take this through the MFD tree (after the
regulator subsystem maintainers approve the regulators driver).
I have added the remaining regulators to the driver just today and plan
to send the first non-RFC version of the series after I test it, likely
over the weekend. Hopefully the regulators patch will finally get some
attention then.
Thank you, best regards,
K. B.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists