[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<PA4PR04MB96382B94DE69E53451DDB9B2D1322@PA4PR04MB9638.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 02:14:25 +0000
From: David Lin <yu-hao.lin@....com>
To: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
CC: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>, "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Pete Hsieh <tsung-hsien.hsieh@....com>,
rafael.beims <rafael.beims@...adex.com>, Francesco Dolcini
<francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v9 0/2] wifi: mwifiex: add code to support host
mlme
> From: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2024 5:29 AM
> To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
> Cc: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>; linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; David Lin <yu-hao.lin@....com>; Pete Hsieh
> <tsung-hsien.hsieh@....com>; rafael.beims <rafael.beims@...adex.com>;
> Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v9 0/2] wifi: mwifiex: add code to support host mlme
>
> Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or
> opening attachments. When in doubt, report the message using the 'Report
> this email' button
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 11:24:34AM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
> > Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it> writes:
> >
> > > Hello Brian (and Kalle),
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 10:00:51AM +0800, David Lin wrote:
> > >> This series add host based MLME support to the mwifiex driver, this
> > >> enables WPA3 support in both client and AP mode.
> > >
> > > What's your plan for this series? I know you raised some concern
> > > when this started months ago and I'd love to know if there is
> > > something that would need to be addressed to move forward here.
> >
> > Based on the history of this patchset I am a bit concerned if these
> > patches break existing setups. I'm sure Brian will look at that in
> > detail but more test results from different setups we have the better.
>
> It looks like the latest patches generally avoid touching behavior for devices
> without this feature-set. And I've given it a bit of a whirl myself, although I have
> a pretty blind eye to AP-mode as my systems tend to be clients.
>
> Yes, testing is always a concern for invasive changes, but I think we're in OK
> shape at least w.r.t. regressing existing setups. Or, I won't provide an Acked-by
> until I'm happy.
>
> Brian
No matter with or without host mlme, this patch is tested by NXP QA, Rafael, Francesco and myself.
Thanks,
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists