[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tencent_A747085CAC18CD10C3C6623E1FC17B6D6707@qq.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 10:33:20 +0800
From: Yangyu Chen <cyy@...self.name>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rabenda.cn@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/7] riscv: Kconfig.socs: Split ARCH_CANAAN and
SOC_CANAAN_K210
> On Mar 21, 2024, at 02:51, Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 05:39:14PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
>
>> I got a k230 board (the canmv one) so I should be able to test this
>> myself before picking stuff up.
>
> I've taken a bit of a look at the "sdk" and appears to be a complete
> mess to a non-chinese speaker like me.
> I know you linked a copy of opensbi to use with this, but do you also
> have a version of U-Boot to use with this that is not riddled with
> crap and will compile with a normal toolchain?
>
I don’t have one. But I know Revy (Han Gao) built a u-boot repo
from vendor SDK which is at submodule on
https://github.com/revyos/mkimg-k230 . However, it just apply a huge
diff from vendor SDK to mainline u-boot and can be built from a
standard gcc toolchain.
> I have chanced upon Courmisch's repo that looks significantly more
> usable than whatever Canaan have so I guess I will use that:
> https://code.videolan.org/Courmisch/k230-boot
>
Thanks for this hint.
> :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists