[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ebdeceae-62b6-4674-ab19-a3252d52f296@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 18:25:30 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/31] Clean up thermal zone polling-delay
On 19/03/2024 17:13, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> A trivial follow-up on the changes introduced in Commit 488164006a28
> ("thermal/of: Assume polling-delay(-passive) 0 when absent").
>
> Should probably wait until v6.9-rc1 so that the patch in question is
> in the base tree, otherwise TZs will fail to register.
>
> FWIW, Compile-tested only (except 8280).
>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
> ---
Are you sure these changes are correct. They are not related to commit
488164006a28.
If the sensor has interrupt support, then it can specify:
polling-delay = <0>;
As a zero polling value can be omitted in the DT then it can be removed.
Then when a trip point is crossed, the interrupt fires but then it must
sample the temperature of the thermal zone to do the mitigation.
I doubt polling-delay-passive must be removed. The changes you
introduced just disable the mitigation and that will lead to board wild
reboots.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists