linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/shstk: Enable shadow stack for x32

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMe9rOoEQ3jUUXy+Kai9Hg83b+79azmGfu8DBR=A3HSL05kj0A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 10:00:09 -0700
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, 
	Rick P Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/shstk: Enable shadow stack for x32

On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 9:56 AM Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com> wrote:
>
> On 3/22/24 09:52, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 9:49 AM Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com> wrote:
> >> On 3/15/24 07:04, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >>> 1. Add shadow stack support to x32 signal.
> >>> 2. Use the 64-bit map_shadow_stack syscall for x32.
> >>> 3. Set up shadow stack for x32.
> >>>
> >>> Tested with shadow stack enabled x32 glibc on Intel Tiger Lake.
> >> I don't think we should wire up code that's never going to get used in
> >> practice.  I think I'd want to be sure of the existence of some
> >> specific, real-world, long-term users of this before we add a new ABI
> >> that we need to support forever.
> >>
> >> Are there real users?
> > Were you talking about x32 users or x32 users with shadow stack?
>
> x32 users who both want and will use shadow stacks.

Someone can do a survey among x32 users.

> It's been a long time since I've seen an x32 bug report.

Because it just works?

-- 
H.J.